Henning Pieper

404 citations
14 papers · 276 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Henning Pieper

14 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Henning Pieper
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 144
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 236
  • Structural Biology 2
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 17
  • Computational Mechanics 20
Replace F. A. Shirland with:
F. A. Shirland United States
J.-U. Sachse Germany
J. Newton United States
Ming-Ju Yang Japan
R. Beaulieu United States
Oliver Schultz Germany
Florent Gardillou France
S. Peters Germany
Y. Quiquempois France
A. Delabie Belgium
Henning Pieper relative to F. A. Shirland United States F. A. Shirland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
F. A. Shirland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Henning Pieper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Henning Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henning Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henning Pieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Henning Pieper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henning Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henning Pieper. The network helps show where Henning Pieper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Henning Pieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Henning Pieper Line = papers co-authored together Henning Pieper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1981167
2 196229
3 197522
4 201613
5 197810
6 19759
7 19849
8
[A new manometric probe with electrical transmission].
19528
9 19573
10 20142
11 20201
12 19741
13
Fegelein's Horsemen and Genocidal Warfare: The SS Cavalry Brigade in the Soviet Union
20141
14 20141

About Henning Pieper

Henning Pieper is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (5 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (4 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (3 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (2 papers), German History and Society (2 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (2 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (2 papers) and Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (144 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (236 citations), Structural Biology (2 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (17 citations) and Computational Mechanics (20 citations). Henning Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include K. Graff, E. Wetterer, Eyal Zisser, Yitzhak Shichor, Rob Johnson, Béatrice Heuser, Efraim Inbar, Stephen Blank and David E. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Electronic Materials, Electrochimica Acta, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, The International History Review and German History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact