Henk te Velthuis
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 4
- Hematology top 5%
- Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms 6
- Platelet Disorders and Treatments 3
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques 13
-
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices 8
-
- Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research 7
-
- Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion 6
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 4
- Co-authors
- Piet JansenCharles R.H. WildevuurL. EijsmanBerent J. PrakkenGer T. RijkersWilco de JagerWietse KuisC. Erik Hack
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Henk te Velthuis
35 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 757
- Hematology 339
- Internal Medicine 91
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 100
- Surgery 780
Countries citing papers authored by Henk te Velthuis
This map shows the geographic impact of Henk te Velthuis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henk te Velthuis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henk te Velthuis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Henk te Velthuis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henk te Velthuis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henk te Velthuis. The network helps show where Henk te Velthuis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Henk te Velthuis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 145 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 46 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 76 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 115 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 37 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 28 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 93 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 54 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 43 |
About Henk te Velthuis
Henk te Velthuis is a scholar working on Hematology, Immunology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (13 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (8 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (7 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (6 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers) and Platelet Disorders and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (757 citations), Hematology (339 citations) and Internal Medicine (91 citations). Henk te Velthuis has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Piet Jansen, Charles R.H. Wildevuur, L. Eijsman, Berent J. Prakken, Ger T. Rijkers, Wilco de Jager, Wietse Kuis, C. Erik Hack, Peter Bruins and Aria P. Yazdanbakhsh. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Circulation and The Journal of Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.