Henk Koster

838 citations
22 papers · 701 indexed · h-index 14

Henk Koster

22 papers receiving 666 citations

Peers

Henk Koster
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Pharmacology 286
  • Hepatology 146
  • Biochemistry 55
  • Oncology 174
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 101
Replace Teija Oinonen with:
Teija Oinonen Finland
Antoine Vercruysse Belgium
Paul M. Silber United States
Donna Li United States
Anna-Karin Sohlenius-Sternbeck Sweden
B. O. Depelchin Belgium
Brian A. Laishes United States
Georg F. Kahl Germany
Kajsa P. Kanebratt Sweden
Wenwen Wang China
Henk Koster relative to Teija Oinonen Finland Teija Oinonen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Teija Oinonen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Henk Koster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Henk Koster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henk Koster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henk Koster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Henk Koster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henk Koster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henk Koster. The network helps show where Henk Koster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Henk Koster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Henk Koster Line = papers co-authored together Henk Koster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200648
2 200336
3 20024
4 200236
5 20022
6 200113
7 200037
8 200036
9 199840
10 199797
11
Novel and simple method for cryopreservation of human liver slices.
19961
12 199675
13 199524
14 198358
15 19829
16 19826
17 198221
18 198148
19 198181
20
Inhibition of sulfation of phenols in vivo by 2,6-dichloro-4-nitrophenol: selectivity of its action in relation to other conjugations in the rat in vivo.
19798

About Henk Koster

Henk Koster is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Aging, Clinical Biochemistry, Small Animals and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (7 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (6 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (5 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Berberine and alkaloids research (2 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (286 citations), Hepatology (146 citations), Biochemistry (55 citations), Oncology (174 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (101 citations). Henk Koster has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Inge A.M. de Graaf, Egbert Scholtens, Gerard J. Mulder, K. Sandy Pang, Ruben de Kanter, Geny M. M. Groothuis, Peter Olinga, Ingrid H. Hof, G J Mulder and A.A.J.J.L. Rutten. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Pharmacology, Cryobiology, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Alternatives to Laboratory Animals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026