Helen Glyde

860 total citations
19 papers, 617 citations indexed

About

Helen Glyde is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen Glyde has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 617 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Speech and Hearing and 9 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Helen Glyde's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (17 papers), Noise Effects and Management (13 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers). Helen Glyde is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (17 papers), Noise Effects and Management (13 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers). Helen Glyde collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Helen Glyde's co-authors include Sharon Cameron, Harvey Dillon, Louise Hickson, Mark Seeto, Jörg M. Buchholz, Wayne J. Wilson, Dani Tomlin, Virginia Best, Jessica Whitfield and Alison King and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Advances in experimental medicine and biology and Ear and Hearing.

In The Last Decade

Helen Glyde

18 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Helen Glyde Australia 12 579 364 262 123 92 19 617
Marc Brennan United States 12 484 0.8× 242 0.7× 220 0.8× 181 1.5× 110 1.2× 27 507
Lyndal Carter Australia 15 710 1.2× 352 1.0× 377 1.4× 164 1.3× 54 0.6× 25 740
Shilpi Banerjee India 6 677 1.2× 403 1.1× 360 1.4× 139 1.1× 45 0.5× 13 762
Tobias Neher Denmark 16 728 1.3× 571 1.6× 287 1.1× 247 2.0× 51 0.6× 70 772
Andrew J. Vermiglio United States 11 423 0.7× 281 0.8× 281 1.1× 83 0.7× 40 0.4× 24 445
Leonard E. Cornelisse Canada 10 723 1.2× 417 1.1× 334 1.3× 261 2.1× 113 1.2× 16 764
John Pumford Canada 7 511 0.9× 278 0.8× 249 1.0× 166 1.3× 105 1.1× 13 536
Fanny Scherf Belgium 10 433 0.7× 265 0.7× 295 1.1× 46 0.4× 80 0.9× 23 460
Sangsook Choi United States 10 345 0.6× 170 0.5× 127 0.5× 104 0.8× 88 1.0× 15 376
Patti M. Johnstone United States 8 769 1.3× 442 1.2× 509 1.9× 144 1.2× 135 1.5× 19 791

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Glyde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Glyde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Glyde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Glyde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Glyde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Glyde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Glyde. The network helps show where Helen Glyde may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Glyde

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Glyde. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Glyde based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Glyde. Helen Glyde is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Glyde, Helen, et al.. (2020). Determining unilateral or bilateral hearing aid preference in adults: a prospective study. International Journal of Audiology. 60(5). 341–349. 4 indexed citations
2.
Best, Virginia, Christine R. Mason, Jayaganesh Swaminathan, et al.. (2016). On the Contribution of Target Audibility to Performance in Spatialized Speech Mixtures. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 894. 83–91. 7 indexed citations
3.
Cameron, Sharon, Helen Glyde, Harvey Dillon, Jessica Whitfield, & John P. Seymour. (2016). The Dichotic Digits difference Test (DDdT): Development, Normative Data, and Test‐Retest Reliability Studies Part 1. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 27(6). 458–469. 22 indexed citations
4.
Cameron, Sharon, Helen Glyde, Harvey Dillon, & Jessica Whitfield. (2016). Investigating the Interaction between Dichotic Deficits and Cognitive Abilities Using the Dichotic Digits difference Test (DDdT) Part 2. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 27(6). 470–479. 14 indexed citations
5.
Cameron, Sharon, et al.. (2015). Results from a national central auditory processing disorder service: a "real world" assessment of diagnostic practices and remediation for CAPD. 3 indexed citations
6.
Glyde, Helen, Jörg M. Buchholz, Virginia Best, et al.. (2015). Effect of audibility on spatial release from speech-on-speech masking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 138(5). 3311–3319. 24 indexed citations
7.
Dillon, Harvey, Richard van Hoesel, Elizabeth Francis Beach, et al.. (2015). Loss of speech perception in noise – causes and compensation. 5. 205–216. 1 indexed citations
9.
Cameron, Sharon, et al.. (2014). Prevalence and remediation of spatial processing disorder (SPD) in Indigenous children in regional Australia. International Journal of Audiology. 53(5). 326–335. 35 indexed citations
10.
Glyde, Helen, Sharon Cameron, Harvey Dillon, & Louise Hickson. (2014). Remediation of Spatial Processing Deficits in Hearing-Impaired Children and Adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 25(6). 549–561. 8 indexed citations
11.
Cameron, Sharon & Helen Glyde. (2014). Comparison of Two Working Memory Test Paradigms: Correlation with Academic Performance in School-Aged Children. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1(3). 2 indexed citations
12.
Glyde, Helen, Jörg M. Buchholz, Harvey Dillon, et al.. (2013). The effect of better-ear glimpsing on spatial release from masking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 134(4). 2937–2945. 51 indexed citations
13.
Glyde, Helen, Jörg M. Buchholz, Harvey Dillon, Sharon Cameron, & Louise Hickson. (2013). The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 134(2). EL147–EL152. 50 indexed citations
14.
Cameron, Sharon, Helen Glyde, & Harvey Dillon. (2012). Efficacy of the LiSN & Learn Auditory Training Software: Randomized Blinded Controlled Study. Audiology Research. 2(1). e15–e15. 45 indexed citations
15.
Dillon, Harvey, Sharon Cameron, Helen Glyde, Wayne J. Wilson, & Dani Tomlin. (2012). An Opinion on the Assessment of People Who May Have an Auditory Processing Disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 23(2). 97–105. 70 indexed citations
16.
Glyde, Helen, Sharon Cameron, Harvey Dillon, Louise Hickson, & Mark Seeto. (2012). The Effects of Hearing Impairment and Aging on Spatial Processing. Ear and Hearing. 34(1). 15–28. 123 indexed citations
17.
Cameron, Sharon, Helen Glyde, & Harvey Dillon. (2011). Listening in Spatialized Noise—Sentences Test (LiSN-S): Normative and Retest Reliability Data for Adolescents and Adults up to 60 Years of Age. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 22(10). 697–709. 86 indexed citations
18.
Glyde, Helen, Louise Hickson, Sharon Cameron, & Harvey Dillon. (2011). Problems Hearing in Noise in Older Adults. PubMed. 15(3). 116–126. 53 indexed citations
19.
Mazlan, Rafidah, Joseph Kei, Louise Hickson, et al.. (2009). Test–Retest Reliability of Acoustic Reflex Test in 6-Week-Old Healthy Infants. 31(1). 25–32.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026