Helen Cleak

1.0k total citations
63 papers, 763 citations indexed

About

Helen Cleak is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Administration and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen Cleak has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 763 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in General Health Professions, 30 papers in Public Administration and 15 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Helen Cleak's work include Social Work Education and Practice (30 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (25 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers). Helen Cleak is often cited by papers focused on Social Work Education and Practice (30 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (25 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers). Helen Cleak collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Helen Cleak's co-authors include Ines Zuchowski, Debra Smith, Jill Wilson, Anthea Vreugdenhil, Audrey Roulston, Debra Smith, Martin Ryan, Chaitali Das, Janet Carter Anand and Annie Venville and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Helen Cleak

55 papers receiving 718 citations

Peers

Helen Cleak
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • General Health Professions 522
  • Public Administration 475
  • Education 233
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • Health 88
Martin Ryan Australia
Sue Peckover United Kingdom
Steven Shardlow United Kingdom
Joanne Warner United Kingdom
Suzy Braye United Kingdom
Wendy Bowles Australia
John Poulin United States
Paula McFadden United Kingdom
Julie S. Abramson United States
Larry Nackerud United States
Martin Ryan Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Helen Cleak
Helen Cleak · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Helen Cleak
Helen Cleak · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Cleak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Cleak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Cleak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Cleak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Cleak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Cleak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Cleak. The network helps show where Helen Cleak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Cleak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Cleak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Cleak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Cleak. Helen Cleak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 6
4 13
5 4
6 21
7 14
8 0
9 23
10 3
11 27
12 37
13
Inspiration or Desperation: The challenge of innovation in field education in the Australian context
2
14
Screening for partner violence among family mediation clients: Differentiating types of abuse
1
15
One way or many ways: Screening for family violence in family mediation
1
16 39
17 3
18 32
19 24
20 11

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026