Helen A. Pass

842 total citations
16 papers, 419 citations indexed

About

Helen A. Pass is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen A. Pass has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 419 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Cancer Research, 7 papers in Surgery and 7 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Helen A. Pass's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (13 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (7 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (7 papers). Helen A. Pass is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (13 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (7 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (7 papers). Helen A. Pass collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Helen A. Pass's co-authors include Frank A. Vicini, Ivy A. Petersen, John Wong, Douglas W. Arthur, Rachel Rabinovitch, Susan Chafe, Beryl McCormick, Kathryn Winter, Julia White and Neal S. Goldstein and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and The American Journal of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Helen A. Pass

13 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Helen A. Pass United States 8 370 193 191 127 84 16 419
Pamela R. Benitez United States 9 385 1.0× 164 0.8× 223 1.2× 197 1.6× 91 1.1× 11 453
Mohamed Akra Canada 6 278 0.8× 138 0.7× 100 0.5× 90 0.7× 88 1.0× 9 343
J. Vito Antonucci United States 8 293 0.8× 175 0.9× 184 1.0× 99 0.8× 65 0.8× 16 418
Daniela Kauer-Dorner Austria 9 276 0.7× 142 0.7× 181 0.9× 126 1.0× 85 1.0× 18 385
D.W. Arthur United States 12 345 0.9× 305 1.6× 140 0.7× 126 1.0× 69 0.8× 29 486
Adrian Harnett United Kingdom 7 497 1.3× 125 0.6× 228 1.2× 165 1.3× 273 3.3× 9 615
G.S. Gustafson United States 13 306 0.8× 126 0.7× 179 0.9× 117 0.9× 152 1.8× 26 475
Victor J. Zannis United States 13 567 1.5× 249 1.3× 302 1.6× 251 2.0× 139 1.7× 18 662
Janice G. Rothschild United States 8 348 0.9× 100 0.5× 253 1.3× 252 2.0× 102 1.2× 14 504
J Fayad United States 5 384 1.0× 360 1.9× 114 0.6× 101 0.8× 48 0.6× 6 479

Countries citing papers authored by Helen A. Pass

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen A. Pass's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen A. Pass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen A. Pass more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen A. Pass

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen A. Pass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen A. Pass. The network helps show where Helen A. Pass may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen A. Pass

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen A. Pass. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen A. Pass based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen A. Pass. Helen A. Pass is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Pass, Helen A., et al.. (2023). Routine Use of a Standardized Mastectomy Diagram by Surgeons Improves Accuracy and Timeliness of the Final Pathological Report. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 30(12). 7124–7130.
3.
Aghayev, Ayaz, Ezana Azene, Maros Ferencik, et al.. (2022). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Deep Inferior Epigastric Arteries for Surgical Planning (Breast Reconstruction Surgery): 2022 Update. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 19(11). S357–S363. 2 indexed citations
4.
Heller, Samantha L., Ana P. Lourenço, Bethany L. Niell, et al.. (2020). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 17(11). S403–S414. 19 indexed citations
5.
Rabinovitch, Rachel, Jennifer Moughan, Frank A. Vicini, et al.. (2016). Long-Term Update of NRG Oncology RTOG 0319: A Phase 1 and 2 Trial to Evaluate 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy Confined to the Region of the Lumpectomy Cavity for Stage I and II Breast Carcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 96(5). 1054–1059. 27 indexed citations
6.
Chafe, Susan, Jennifer Moughan, Beryl McCormick, et al.. (2013). Late Toxicity and Patient Self-Assessment of Breast Appearance/Satisfaction on RTOG 0319: A Phase 2 Trial of 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy-Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Following Lumpectomy for Stages I and II Breast Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 86(5). 854–859. 35 indexed citations
7.
Rabinovitch, Rachel, Jennifer Moughan, Frank A. Vicini, et al.. (2013). Long-term Update of RTOG 0319: A Phase 1/2 Trial to Evaluate 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT) Confined to the Region of the Lumpectomy Cavity for Stage I and II Breast Carcinoma (BrCa). International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 87(2). S6–S6. 1 indexed citations
8.
Pass, Helen A.. (2010). Optimal Use of Re-Excision in Patients Diagnosed with Early-Stage Breast Cancer by Excisional Biopsy Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy. Breast Diseases A Year Book Quarterly. 21(3). 247–248. 2 indexed citations
9.
Vicini, Frank A., Kathryn Winter, John Wong, et al.. (2009). Initial Efficacy Results of RTOG 0319: Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT) Confined to the Region of the Lumpectomy Cavity for Stage I/ II Breast Carcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 77(4). 1120–1127. 125 indexed citations
10.
Pass, Helen A., Suzanne Klimberg, & Edward M. Copeland. (2008). Are “Breast-Focused” Surgeons More Competent?. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 15(4). 953–955. 21 indexed citations
11.
Pass, Helen A., et al.. (2007). A call to arms. The American Journal of Surgery. 194(4). 423–425. 1 indexed citations
12.
Vicini, Frank A., Kathryn Winter, William L. Straube, et al.. (2005). A phase I/II trial to evaluate three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for stage I/II breast carcinoma: Initial report of feasibility and reproducibility of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Study 0319. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 63(5). 1531–1537. 106 indexed citations
13.
14.
Vicini, Frank A., Neal S. Goldstein, Helen A. Pass, & Larry L. Kestin. (2004). Use of pathologic factors to assist in establishing adequacy of excision before radiotherapy in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 60(1). 86–94. 29 indexed citations
15.
Vicini, Frank A., et al.. (2004). The use of pathologic factors to assist in establishing adequacy of excision prior to radiation therapy in patients treated with breast conserving therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 60(1). S280–S280. 7 indexed citations
16.
Pettinga, Jane, et al.. (2002). Giant Mammary Lipoma. The Breast Journal. 8(5). 307–308. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026