Hein van Gils

28 papers receiving 604 citations

Peers

Hein van Gils
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Ecological Modeling 196
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 177
  • Ecology 260
  • Global and Planetary Change 148
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 48
Replace Özgün Emre Can with:
Özgün Emre Can United Kingdom
Susan A. Mainka China
Isabel C. Barrio Spain
Emma R. Bush United Kingdom
Adam Duarte United States
Donald C. Ruthven United States
Federica Chiozza Italy
Malcolm S. Kennedy Australia
William M. Giuliano United States
Hein van Gils relative to Özgün Emre Can United Kingdom Özgün Emre Can's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Özgün Emre Can · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hein van Gils

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hein van Gils's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hein van Gils with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hein van Gils more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hein van Gils

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hein van Gils. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hein van Gils. The network helps show where Hein van Gils may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hein van Gils, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hein van Gils Line = papers co-authored together Hein van Gils links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015134
2 201355
3 201851
4 201247
5 200941
6 201841
7 200835
8 201334
9 200927
10 200927
11 201317
12 201617
13 201213
14 201712
15 200912
16 201411
17 201210
18
Efficacy of Chromolaena odorata control in a South African conservation forest
20048
19 20228
20 20138

About Hein van Gils

Hein van Gils is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science and Ecological Modeling, having authored 29 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (196 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (177 citations), Ecology (260 citations), Global and Planetary Change (148 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (48 citations). Hein van Gils has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Rafael M. Navarro‐Cerrillo, T.A. Groen, Joaquín Duque‐Lazo, Giampiero Ciaschetti, Andrew K. Skidmore, Fabio Conti, Antonio Antonucci, Rohan Bennett, Iain Douglas‐Hamilton and Shadrack Ngene. Their work appears in journals such as Landscape History, Forest Ecology and Management, South African Journal of Science, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment and Journal for Nature Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact