Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Business resilience in times of growth and crisis
2015301 citationsHeidi Dahles et al.Annals of Tourism Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Heidi Dahles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heidi Dahles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heidi Dahles more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heidi Dahles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heidi Dahles. The network helps show where Heidi Dahles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heidi Dahles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heidi Dahles.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heidi Dahles based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Heidi Dahles. Heidi Dahles is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dahles, Heidi, et al.. (2012). Graduate entrepreneurship in Tanzania: Contextual enablers and hindrances. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 76(3). 386–402.26 indexed citations
10.
Dahles, Heidi & Juliette Koning. (2009). Spiritual power: Ethnic Chinese managers and the rise of charismatic Christianity in Southeast Asia. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies. 27(1). 5–37.6 indexed citations
11.
Dahles, Heidi. (2007). Creating social capital as a competitive advantage in China. Singapore Chinese entrepreneurs venturing into China. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 182–208.1 indexed citations
Dahles, Heidi, et al.. (2002). Tourism development and local participation in Latin America.24 indexed citations
14.
Dahles, Heidi. (2002). The Politics of Tour Guiding. Annals of Tourism Research. 29(3). 783–800.180 indexed citations
15.
Dahles, Heidi. (2001). Tourism, Heritage and National Culture in Java: Dilemmas of a Local Community. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).43 indexed citations
16.
Dahles, Heidi, et al.. (2000). Entrepreneurship and Education in Tourism. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 5–5.5 indexed citations
17.
Dahles, Heidi, et al.. (1999). Local Perspectives on Global Tourism in the Asia-Pacific Region. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 7–12.1 indexed citations
18.
Dahles, Heidi, et al.. (1999). Tourism and Small Entrepreneurs. Development, National Policy and Entrepreneurial Culture. Indonesian Cases. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).67 indexed citations
19.
Dahles, Heidi, et al.. (1999). Tourism and small entrepreneurs in developing countries. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–19.1 indexed citations
20.
Dahles, Heidi. (1987). Weidelijkheid. Een sleutel tot het zelfbeeld van jagers. Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift. 14(3). 469–492.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.