Heather Pringle

416 total citations
10 papers, 292 citations indexed

About

Heather Pringle is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather Pringle has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 292 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 1 paper in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Heather Pringle's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). Heather Pringle is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). Heather Pringle collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Heather Pringle's co-authors include Arthur F. Kramer, David E. Irwin, David L. Strayer, Jason S. McCarley, Paul Atchley, J. Graham Beaumont and Christopher D. Wickens and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review and Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

In The Last Decade

Heather Pringle

10 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heather Pringle United States 6 159 101 88 39 35 10 292
Leonard J. Williams United States 8 187 1.2× 181 1.8× 61 0.7× 42 1.1× 50 1.4× 12 337
Lisbeth Harms Denmark 10 240 1.5× 143 1.4× 210 2.4× 56 1.4× 65 1.9× 22 446
Annie Pauzié France 5 185 1.2× 23 0.2× 79 0.9× 23 0.6× 32 0.9× 20 229
Mark Chattington United Kingdom 9 166 1.0× 138 1.4× 75 0.9× 32 0.8× 28 0.8× 14 330
Tapio Nieminen Finland 4 332 2.1× 68 0.7× 243 2.8× 71 1.8× 37 1.1× 7 407
Elizabeth Crundall United Kingdom 12 265 1.7× 49 0.5× 190 2.2× 27 0.7× 27 0.8× 21 376
James W. Jenness United States 10 231 1.5× 74 0.7× 136 1.5× 33 0.8× 8 0.2× 40 302
Sonia Ortiz‐Peregrina Spain 11 77 0.5× 59 0.6× 130 1.5× 106 2.7× 18 0.5× 35 342
Miriam Casares‐López Spain 10 75 0.5× 56 0.6× 121 1.4× 98 2.5× 16 0.5× 28 305
Matthew Yanko Canada 6 104 0.7× 231 2.3× 78 0.9× 18 0.5× 104 3.0× 11 366

Countries citing papers authored by Heather Pringle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Pringle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Pringle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Pringle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Pringle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Pringle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Pringle. The network helps show where Heather Pringle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather Pringle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather Pringle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather Pringle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather Pringle. Heather Pringle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Pringle, Heather. (2010). Google Earth Shows Clandestine Worlds. Science. 329(5995). 1008–1009. 23 indexed citations
2.
Pringle, Heather. (2010). NASA Dives Into Its Past to Retrieve Vintage Satellite Data. Science. 327(5971). 1322–1323. 3 indexed citations
3.
McCarley, Jason S., et al.. (2004). Conversation Disrupts Change Detection in Complex Traffic Scenes. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 46(3). 424–436. 116 indexed citations
4.
McCarley, Jason S., et al.. (2004). Conversation Disrupts Change Detection in Complex Traffic Scenes. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 46(3). 424–436. 1 indexed citations
5.
McCarley, Jason S., et al.. (2004). Conversation Disrupts Change Detection in Complex Traffic Scenes. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 46(3). 424–436. 2 indexed citations
6.
Beaumont, J. Graham, et al.. (2002). The role of imagery in the rehabilitation of neglect in severely disabled brain-injured adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 17(5). 407–422. 17 indexed citations
7.
Pringle, Heather, David E. Irwin, Arthur F. Kramer, & Paul Atchley. (2001). The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 8(1). 89–95. 95 indexed citations
8.
McCarley, Jason S., et al.. (2001). Conversation Disrupts Visual Scanning of Traffic Scenes. 23 indexed citations
9.
Pringle, Heather. (2000). The Roles of Scene Characteristics, Memory and Attentional Breadth on the Representation of Complex Real -World Scenes. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 5 indexed citations
10.
Wickens, Christopher D., et al.. (1999). Integration of Information Sources of Varying Weights: The Effect of Display Features and Attention Cueing. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026