Heather E. Logan

3.8k total citations
48 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Heather E. Logan is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather E. Logan has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 12 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Heather E. Logan's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (47 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (22 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (20 papers). Heather E. Logan is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (47 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (22 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (20 papers). Heather E. Logan collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Heather E. Logan's co-authors include Tao Han, Lian-Tao Wang, Bob McElrath, Howard E. Haber, Kunal Kumar, V. Barger, Gabe Shaughnessy, Hooman Davoudiasl, Vikram Rentala and Shufang Su and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces and Physical review. D.

In The Last Decade

Heather E. Logan

47 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heather E. Logan Canada 22 1.5k 551 42 35 23 48 1.5k
G. Moreau France 20 990 0.7× 279 0.5× 11 0.3× 36 1.6× 36 1.0k
Sabyasachi Chakraborty India 12 320 0.2× 126 0.2× 10 0.2× 11 0.3× 1 0.0× 26 388
Ciaran Williams United States 19 979 0.7× 164 0.3× 25 0.7× 29 1.3× 37 1.0k
M. Spira Germany 14 1.1k 0.8× 200 0.4× 73 2.1× 34 1.5× 22 1.1k
Ipsita Saha India 16 510 0.3× 204 0.4× 31 0.9× 11 0.5× 34 554
J. Lorenzo Díaz-Cruz Mexico 21 1.3k 0.8× 293 0.5× 20 0.6× 18 0.8× 79 1.3k
M. Awramik Poland 11 663 0.4× 203 0.4× 19 0.5× 16 0.7× 13 673
C. Schappacher Germany 14 746 0.5× 197 0.4× 37 1.1× 13 0.6× 23 752
Tania Robens Germany 10 659 0.4× 285 0.5× 33 0.9× 23 1.0× 34 666
M. A. Baak Switzerland 6 710 0.5× 275 0.5× 43 1.2× 7 0.3× 7 724

Countries citing papers authored by Heather E. Logan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather E. Logan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather E. Logan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather E. Logan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather E. Logan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather E. Logan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather E. Logan. The network helps show where Heather E. Logan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather E. Logan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather E. Logan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather E. Logan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather E. Logan. Heather E. Logan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Logan, Heather E., et al.. (2024). Can CP be conserved in the two-Higgs-doublet model?. Physical review. D. 110(9). 4 indexed citations
2.
Logan, Heather E., et al.. (2024). Is the Real Two-Higgs-Doublet Model Consistent?. Physical Review Letters. 133(20). 201801–201801. 4 indexed citations
3.
Ferreira, P. M., et al.. (2021). Vacuum structure of the Z(2) symmetric Georgi-Machacek model. Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa (Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa). 6 indexed citations
4.
Logan, Heather E., et al.. (2021). Probing dark sector CP violation with electric dipole moments and colliders. Physical review. D. 103(11). 1 indexed citations
5.
Ismail, Ameen, et al.. (2021). Benchmark for LHC searches for low-mass custodial fiveplet scalars in the Georgi-Machacek model. Physical review. D. 103(9). 13 indexed citations
6.
Logan, Heather E., et al.. (2020). Custodial symmetry violation in the Georgi-Machacek model. Physical review. D. 102(1). 17 indexed citations
7.
Godfrey, Stephen, et al.. (2017). Real singlet scalar dark matter extension of the Georgi-Machacek model. Physical review. D. 95(1). 17 indexed citations
8.
Logan, Heather E., et al.. (2015). LHC constraints on large scalar multiplet models with aZ2symmetry. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 92(5). 1 indexed citations
9.
Zaro, Marco & Heather E. Logan. (2015). Recommendations for the interpretation of LHC searches for $H_5^0$, $H_5^{\pm}$, and $H_5^{\pm\pm}$ in vector boson fusion with decays to vector boson pairs. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
10.
Logan, Heather E.. (2014). Hiding a Higgs width enhancement from off-shell gg (--> h*) --> ZZ. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
11.
Killick, Ryan, Kunal Kumar, & Heather E. Logan. (2013). Learning what the Higgs is mixed with. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
12.
Logan, Heather E., et al.. (2010). Higgs couplings in a model with triplets. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 82(11). 48 indexed citations
13.
Barger, V., Wai-Yee Keung, Heather E. Logan, & Gabe Shaughnessy. (2006). Neutralino annihilation toqq¯g. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 74(7). 6 indexed citations
14.
Han, Tao, et al.. (2005). Neutrino masses and lepton-number violation in the littlest Higgs scenario. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 72(5). 42 indexed citations
15.
Han, Tao, Heather E. Logan, Bob McElrath, & Lian-Tao Wang. (2003). Loop induced decays of the Little Higgs: H --> gg, gamma gamma. arXiv (Cornell University). 21 indexed citations
16.
Han, Tao, Heather E. Logan, Bob McElrath, & Lian-Tao Wang. (2003). Phenomenology of the little Higgs model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 67(9). 357 indexed citations
17.
Logan, Heather E.. (2003). Little Higgs phenomenology. The European Physical Journal C. 33(S1). s729–s731. 7 indexed citations
18.
Gunion, John F., et al.. (2003). e+eνν¯A0in the two-Higgs-doublet model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 68(7). 4 indexed citations
19.
Logan, Heather E. & Shufang Su. (2002). Associated production ofH±andWin high-energye+ecollisions in the minimal supersymmetric standard model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 66(3). 30 indexed citations
20.
Haber, Howard E., M. J. Herrero, Heather E. Logan, et al.. (2001). Supersymmetric QCD corrections to the minimal supersymmetric standard modelh0bb¯vertex in the decoupling limit. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 63(5). 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026