C. Schappacher

1.3k total citations
23 papers, 752 citations indexed

About

C. Schappacher is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Schappacher has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 752 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 4 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in C. Schappacher's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (21 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (12 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (6 papers). C. Schappacher is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (21 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (12 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (6 papers). C. Schappacher collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Colombia. C. Schappacher's co-authors include Thomas Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, Алессандро Струмиа, Guido Marandella, W. Hollik, Oliver Brein, U. Baur, D. Wackeroth, Heidi Rzehak and Thomas Hahn and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Computer Physics Communications and The European Physical Journal C.

In The Last Decade

C. Schappacher

22 papers receiving 734 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Schappacher Germany 14 746 197 37 20 13 23 752
Heidi Rzehak Germany 21 1.3k 1.7× 317 1.6× 42 1.1× 23 1.1× 17 1.3× 50 1.3k
M. A. Baak Switzerland 6 710 1.0× 275 1.4× 43 1.2× 14 0.7× 7 0.5× 7 724
Jérémy Bernon France 8 513 0.7× 222 1.1× 38 1.0× 11 0.6× 6 0.5× 9 520
Minho Son South Korea 12 463 0.6× 118 0.6× 16 0.4× 13 0.7× 9 0.7× 19 469
Priscila de Aquino Belgium 5 386 0.5× 85 0.4× 27 0.7× 28 1.4× 11 0.8× 6 394
K. Hagiwara Japan 7 529 0.7× 98 0.5× 21 0.6× 13 0.7× 15 1.2× 13 535
J. Stelzer Switzerland 6 611 0.8× 231 1.2× 33 0.9× 17 0.8× 16 1.2× 10 630
Tania Robens Germany 10 659 0.9× 285 1.4× 33 0.9× 13 0.7× 23 1.8× 34 666
Otto Eberhardt Germany 10 594 0.8× 162 0.8× 26 0.7× 7 0.3× 9 0.7× 14 602
Béranger Dumont France 8 568 0.8× 250 1.3× 25 0.7× 14 0.7× 9 0.7× 12 572

Countries citing papers authored by C. Schappacher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Schappacher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Schappacher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Schappacher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Schappacher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Schappacher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Schappacher. The network helps show where C. Schappacher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Schappacher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Schappacher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Schappacher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Schappacher. C. Schappacher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chakraborti, Manimala, S. Heinemeyer, Ipsita Saha, & C. Schappacher. (2022). $$(g-2)_\mu $$ and SUSY dark matter: direct detection and collider search complementarity. The European Physical Journal C. 82(5). 26 indexed citations
2.
Heinemeyer, S. & C. Schappacher. (2016). Charged Higgs Boson production at $$e^+e^-$$ e + e - colliders in the complex MSSM: a full one-loop analysis. The European Physical Journal C. 76(10). 8 indexed citations
3.
Heinemeyer, S. & C. Schappacher. (2016). Charged Higgs Boson Production at e+e- Colliders in the Complex MSSM: A Full One-Loop Analysis. Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology). 1 indexed citations
4.
Heinemeyer, S. & C. Schappacher. (2016). Neutral Higgs boson production at $$e^+e^-$$ e + e - colliders in the complex MSSM: a full one-loop analysis. The European Physical Journal C. 76(4). 17 indexed citations
5.
Heinemeyer, S. & C. Schappacher. (2015). Higgs decays into charginos and neutralinos in the complex MSSM: a full one-loop analysis. The European Physical Journal C. 75(5). 17 indexed citations
6.
Heinemeyer, S. & C. Schappacher. (2015). Heavy Higgs decays into sfermions in the complex MSSM: a full one-loop analysis. The European Physical Journal C. 75(5). 13 indexed citations
7.
Hahn, Thomas, et al.. (2015). Renormalization of the Complex MSSM in FeynArts/FormCalc. Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings. 267-269. 158–164. 1 indexed citations
8.
Schappacher, C.. (2015). Fermion-Paarerzeugung in e+e- und Hadron-Kollisionen im Standardmodell und im Minimalen Supersymmetrischen Standardmodell mit expliziter CP-Verletzung.
9.
Hahn, Thomas, et al.. (2014). The implementation of the renormalized complex MSSM in FeynArts and FormCalc. Computer Physics Communications. 185(6). 1529–1545. 36 indexed citations
10.
Heinemeyer, S., et al.. (2014). Fully Automated Calculations in the Complex MSSM. 80–80. 2 indexed citations
11.
Hahn, Thomas, et al.. (2014). New Developments in FormCalc 8.4. 35–35. 3 indexed citations
12.
Heinemeyer, S. & C. Schappacher. (2012). Heavy scalar tau decays in the complex MSSM: a full one-loop analysis. The European Physical Journal C. 72(9). 9 indexed citations
13.
Heinemeyer, S. & C. Schappacher. (2012). Gluino decays in the complex MSSM: a full one-loop analysis. The European Physical Journal C. 72(3). 11 indexed citations
14.
Heinemeyer, S., et al.. (2012). Heavy scalar top quark decays in the complex MSSM: A full one-loop analysis. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 86(3). 22 indexed citations
15.
Bharucha, Aoife, et al.. (2012). Neutralino decays in the complex MSSM at one loop: A comparison of on-shell renormalization schemes. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 86(7). 15 indexed citations
16.
Marandella, Guido, C. Schappacher, & Алессандро Струмиа. (2005). Supersymmetry and precision data after LEP2. Nuclear Physics B. 715(1-2). 173–189. 27 indexed citations
17.
Marandella, Guido, C. Schappacher, & Алессандро Струмиа. (2005). Little-Higgs corrections to precision data after CERN LEP2. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 72(3). 79 indexed citations
18.
Baur, U., Oliver Brein, W. Hollik, C. Schappacher, & D. Wackeroth. (2002). Electroweak radiative corrections to neutral-current Drell-Yan processes at hadron colliders. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 65(3). 157 indexed citations
19.
Hahn, Thomas & C. Schappacher. (2002). The implementation of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model in FeynArts and FormCalc. Computer Physics Communications. 143(1). 54–68. 230 indexed citations
20.
Guasch, Jaume, W. Hollik, J. I. Illana, C. Schappacher, & Joan Solà. (2000). Top quark production and decay in the MSSM. Desy Publications Database (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY). 835–865. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heidi Rzehak Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. A. Baak Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jérémy Bernon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Minho Son Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Priscila de Aquino Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K. Hagiwara Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Stelzer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tania Robens Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Otto Eberhardt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Béranger Dumont
Rankless by CCL
2026