967 total citations 21 papers, 109 citations indexed
About
H.C. Teitler is a scholar working on Anthropology, Organic Chemistry and History.
According to data from OpenAlex, H.C. Teitler has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 109 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Anthropology, 9 papers in Organic Chemistry and 8 papers in History. Recurrent topics in H.C. Teitler's work include Classical Antiquity Studies (16 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (9 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (6 papers). H.C. Teitler is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (16 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (9 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (6 papers). H.C. Teitler collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Germany. H.C. Teitler's co-authors include D. den Hengst, J. den Boeft, Jan Willem Drijvers and A.M.J. Derks and has published in prestigious journals such as The Classical World, Vigiliae Christianae and International Journal of the Classical Tradition.
In The Last Decade
H.C. Teitler
18 papers
receiving
76 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of H.C. Teitler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.C. Teitler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.C. Teitler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.C. Teitler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.C. Teitler. The network helps show where H.C. Teitler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H.C. Teitler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H.C. Teitler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H.C. Teitler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H.C. Teitler. H.C. Teitler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Boeft, J. den, D. den Hengst, & H.C. Teitler. (2017). Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XX. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Boeft, J. den, Jan Willem Drijvers, D. den Hengst, & H.C. Teitler. (2007). Ammianus after Julian: The Reign of Valentinian and Valens in Books 26-31 of the 'Res Gestae'. BRILL eBooks.8 indexed citations
10.
Boeft, J. den, Jan Willem Drijvers, D. den Hengst, & H.C. Teitler. (2005). Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXV.11 indexed citations
11.
Boeft, J. den, Jan Willem Drijvers, D. den Hengst, & H.C. Teitler. (2001). Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus Xxiv.7 indexed citations
12.
Boeft, J. den, Jan Willem Drijvers, D. den Hengst, & H.C. Teitler. (1998). Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXIII.5 indexed citations
Drijvers, Jan Willem, J. den Boeft, D. den Hengst, & H.C. Teitler. (1995). Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus Xxii. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology).9 indexed citations
Teitler, H.C.. (1985). Notarii and exceptores: An inquiry into role and significance of shorthand writers in the Imperial and ecclesiastical bureaucracy of the Roman Empire (from the Early Principate to c. 450 A.D.). BRILL eBooks.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.