Hazel C. Starritt

932 total citations
26 papers, 672 citations indexed

About

Hazel C. Starritt is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Hazel C. Starritt has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 672 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 13 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 4 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in Hazel C. Starritt's work include Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (11 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (11 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers). Hazel C. Starritt is often cited by papers focused on Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (11 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (11 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers). Hazel C. Starritt collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Croatia and United States. Hazel C. Starritt's co-authors include Francis Duck, V.F. Humphrey, F. A. Duck, Gordana Žauhar, Gail ter Haar, Mark Lunt, J. Brian Fowlkes, Kevin Martin, Kjell Å. Salvesen and Stanley B Barnett and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Physics in Medicine and Biology and European Spine Journal.

In The Last Decade

Hazel C. Starritt

24 papers receiving 638 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hazel C. Starritt United Kingdom 15 465 407 157 109 65 26 672
Jeff Powers United States 12 494 1.1× 398 1.0× 94 0.6× 88 0.8× 58 0.9× 25 710
Subha Maruvada United States 15 487 1.0× 362 0.9× 139 0.9× 97 0.9× 26 0.4× 47 614
Vasant A. Salgaonkar United States 16 525 1.1× 374 0.9× 69 0.4× 153 1.4× 21 0.3× 53 663
D. L. Hykes United States 7 170 0.4× 227 0.6× 64 0.4× 23 0.2× 44 0.7× 23 432
Piero Miloro United Kingdom 12 299 0.6× 193 0.5× 113 0.7× 28 0.3× 32 0.5× 33 489
D. Cathignol France 13 411 0.9× 271 0.7× 43 0.3× 97 0.9× 19 0.3× 38 618
W. Apoutou N’Djin France 17 558 1.2× 425 1.0× 81 0.5× 44 0.4× 19 0.3× 53 716
George Keilman United States 12 519 1.1× 226 0.6× 35 0.2× 180 1.7× 64 1.0× 27 663
François T.H. Yu Canada 15 475 1.0× 290 0.7× 89 0.6× 70 0.6× 30 0.5× 46 774
James Jago United States 13 309 0.7× 273 0.7× 77 0.5× 17 0.2× 34 0.5× 44 519

Countries citing papers authored by Hazel C. Starritt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel C. Starritt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel C. Starritt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel C. Starritt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel C. Starritt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel C. Starritt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel C. Starritt. The network helps show where Hazel C. Starritt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hazel C. Starritt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hazel C. Starritt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hazel C. Starritt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hazel C. Starritt. Hazel C. Starritt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Starritt, Hazel C., et al.. (2013). Paediatric x-ray radiation dose reduction and image quality analysis. Journal of Radiological Protection. 33(3). 621–633. 27 indexed citations
2.
Barnett, Stanley B, Charles C. Church, Francis Duck, et al.. (2012). The Safe Use of Ultrasound in Medical Diagnosis. 37 indexed citations
3.
Starritt, Hazel C., et al.. (2009). Estimation of organ and effective doses resulting from cone beam CT imaging for radiotherapy treatment planning. British Journal of Radiology. 82(979). 577–584. 27 indexed citations
4.
Starritt, Hazel C., et al.. (2008). Effective doses to patients from CT acquisitions on the GE Infinia Hawkeye: a comparison of calculation methods. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 29(2). 144–149. 25 indexed citations
5.
Žauhar, Gordana, Francis Duck, & Hazel C. Starritt. (2005). Comparison of the Acoustic Streaming in Amniotic Fluid and Water in Medical Ultrasonic Beams. Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound. 28(2). 152–158. 9 indexed citations
6.
Starritt, Hazel C., et al.. (2003). Prediction of the Temperature Rise at the Surface of Clinical Ultrasound Transducers. 11(3). 26–28. 3 indexed citations
7.
Starritt, Hazel C., Caroline L. Hoad, Francis Duck, et al.. (2000). Measurement of acoustic streaming using magnetic resonance. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 26(2). 321–333. 19 indexed citations
8.
Žauhar, Gordana, Hazel C. Starritt, & Francis Duck. (1998). Studies of acoustic streaming in biological fluids with an ultrasound Doppler technique.. British Journal of Radiology. 71(843). 297–302. 27 indexed citations
9.
Palmer, S.H., et al.. (1998). Radiation protection of the ovaries in young scoliosis patients. European Spine Journal. 7(4). 278–281. 12 indexed citations
10.
Faulkner, K., et al.. (1997). Film viewing conditions in mammography.. British Journal of Radiology. 70(832). 409–411. 6 indexed citations
11.
Duck, Francis & Hazel C. Starritt. (1994). A study of the heating capabilities of diagnostic ultrasound beams. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 20(5). 481–492. 8 indexed citations
12.
Starritt, Hazel C. & F. A. Duck. (1992). A comparison of ultrasound exposure in therapy and pulsed Doppler fields. British Journal of Radiology. 65(775). 557–563. 12 indexed citations
13.
Starritt, Hazel C., Francis Duck, & V.F. Humphrey. (1991). Forces acting in the direction of propagation in pulsed ultrasound fields. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 36(11). 1465–1474. 71 indexed citations
14.
Starritt, Hazel C.. (1990). Book reviews. British Journal of Radiology. 63(753). 739–739.
15.
Haar, Gail ter, F. A. Duck, Hazel C. Starritt, & Stephen R. Daniels. (1989). Biophysical characterisation of diagnostic ultrasound equipment-preliminary results. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 34(11). 1533–1542. 7 indexed citations
16.
Starritt, Hazel C., F. A. Duck, & V.F. Humphrey. (1989). An experimental investigation of streaming in pulsed diagnostic ultrasound beams. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 15(4). 363–373. 83 indexed citations
17.
Duck, F. A., et al.. (1987). A survey of the acoustic output of ultrasonic Doppler equipment. Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurement. 8(1). 39–49. 23 indexed citations
18.
Duck, Francis & Hazel C. Starritt. (1986). The locations of peak pressures and peak intensities in finite amplitude beams from a pulsed focused transducer. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 12(5). 403–409. 20 indexed citations
19.
Starritt, Hazel C., et al.. (1985). Evidence for ultrasonic finite-amplitude distortion in muscle using medical equipment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 77(1). 302–306. 59 indexed citations
20.
Duck, F. A., Hazel C. Starritt, & Alisha Davies. (1980). Errors in measurement of kVp and exposure time from the presence of a pre-magnetization pulse. British Journal of Radiology. 53(631). 716–718.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jeff Powers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Subha Maruvada Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vasant A. Salgaonkar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. L. Hykes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Piero Miloro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. Cathignol Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by W. Apoutou N’Djin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by George Keilman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by François T.H. Yu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James Jago
Rankless by CCL
2026