F. A. Duck

433 total citations
21 papers, 330 citations indexed

About

F. A. Duck is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, F. A. Duck has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 330 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 6 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in F. A. Duck's work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (7 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (6 papers) and Flow Measurement and Analysis (4 papers). F. A. Duck is often cited by papers focused on Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (7 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (6 papers) and Flow Measurement and Analysis (4 papers). F. A. Duck collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. F. A. Duck's co-authors include Hazel C. Starritt, V.F. Humphrey, P J Tomlin, Andrew Hurrell, C. J. Hodson, Richard S. Meltzer, Karl Q. Schwarz, Bradley B. Keller, Edwin L. Carstensen and S E Clift and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics in Medicine and Biology, Toxicology Letters and IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

In The Last Decade

F. A. Duck

19 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F. A. Duck United Kingdom	11	229	147	67	66	39	21	330
J. W. Valvano United States	6	209 0.9×	199 1.4×	93 1.4×	45 0.7×	45 1.2×	10	411
C. Hartman United States	6	284 1.2×	100 0.7×	36 0.5×	166 2.5×	26 0.7×	6	330
Subha Maruvada United States	15	487 2.1×	362 2.5×	139 2.1×	97 1.5×	26 0.7×	47	614
Ronald A. Robinson United States	11	106 0.5×	78 0.5×	28 0.4×	22 0.3×	182 4.7×	20	364
Scott T. Clegg United States	6	346 1.5×	226 1.5×	62 0.9×	24 0.4×	23 0.6×	8	429
Julien Grondin United States	14	279 1.2×	313 2.1×	89 1.3×	29 0.4×	35 0.9×	33	500
Mairéad Butler United Kingdom	13	355 1.6×	227 1.5×	48 0.7×	77 1.2×	15 0.4×	47	426
Satoshi Tamano Japan	10	201 0.9×	216 1.5×	57 0.9×	18 0.3×	14 0.4×	19	314
Marco M. Voormolen Netherlands	13	436 1.9×	324 2.2×	45 0.7×	239 3.6×	46 1.2×	39	751
K. Hynynen United States	10	426 1.9×	340 2.3×	40 0.6×	90 1.4×	21 0.5×	18	470

Countries citing papers authored by F. A. Duck

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. A. Duck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. A. Duck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. A. Duck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. A. Duck

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. A. Duck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. A. Duck. The network helps show where F. A. Duck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. A. Duck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. A. Duck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. A. Duck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. A. Duck. F. A. Duck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Humphrey, V.F., et al.. (2003). A numerical comparison of nonlinear indicators for diagnostic ultrasound fields. Toxicology Letters. 11(1-2). 125–9. 10 indexed citations

Lunt, Mark & F. A. Duck. (2001). Ultrasonic power balances—effect of a coupling window on the power measured from physiotherapy ultrasound units. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 27(8). 1127–1132. 3 indexed citations

Hurrell, Andrew & F. A. Duck. (2000). A two-dimensional hydrophone array using piezoelectric PVDF. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. 47(6). 1345–1353. 21 indexed citations

Duck, F. A.. (1999). Estimating in situ exposure in the presence of acoustic nonlinearity.. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 18(1). 43–53. 26 indexed citations

Carstensen, Edwin L., F. A. Duck, Richard S. Meltzer, Karl Q. Schwarz, & Bradley B. Keller. (1992). Bioeffects in Echocardiography. Echocardiography. 9(6). 605–623. 27 indexed citations

Starritt, Hazel C. & F. A. Duck. (1992). A comparison of ultrasound exposure in therapy and pulsed Doppler fields. British Journal of Radiology. 65(775). 557–563. 12 indexed citations

Haar, Gail ter, F. A. Duck, Hazel C. Starritt, & Stephen R. Daniels. (1989). Biophysical characterisation of diagnostic ultrasound equipment-preliminary results. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 34(11). 1533–1542. 7 indexed citations

Starritt, Hazel C., F. A. Duck, & V.F. Humphrey. (1989). An experimental investigation of streaming in pulsed diagnostic ultrasound beams. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 15(4). 363–373. 83 indexed citations

Duck, F. A., et al.. (1987). A survey of the acoustic output of ultrasonic Doppler equipment. Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurement. 8(1). 39–49. 23 indexed citations

10.

Duck, F. A.. (1986). Ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasonics. 24(5). 294–294. 2 indexed citations

11.

Duck, F. A., et al.. (1985). The output of pulse-echo ultrasound equipment: a survey of powers, pressures and intensities. British Journal of Radiology. 58(694). 989–1001. 55 indexed citations

12.

Duck, F. A., et al.. (1982). Ultrasonic tissue-equivalent materials using inorganic gel mixtures. British Journal of Radiology. 55(657). 667–669. 10 indexed citations

13.

Duck, F. A., Hazel C. Starritt, & Alisha Davies. (1980). Errors in measurement of kVp and exposure time from the presence of a pre-magnetization pulse. British Journal of Radiology. 53(631). 716–718.

14.

Duck, F. A., et al.. (1975). A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF EVALUATING.

15.

Tomlin, P J & F. A. Duck. (1975). Transoesophageal aortic velography in man. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 22(5). 561–571. 6 indexed citations

16.

Tomlin, P J, et al.. (1975). A comparison of methods of evaluating myocardial contractility. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 22(4). 436–448. 8 indexed citations

17.

Tomlin, P J & F. A. Duck. (1974). Total peripheral resistance and diastolic blood flow. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 21(5). 482–494. 5 indexed citations

18.

Duck, F. A., C. J. Hodson, & P J Tomlin. (1974). An esophageal doppler probe for aortic flow velocity monitoring. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 1(3). 233–241. 16 indexed citations

19.

Hodson, C. J. & F. A. Duck. (1973). Spectrum analysis in ultrasonic Doppler blood flow monitoring: experience in its application to deeply situated vessels.. PubMed. 108(11). 1391–4. 1 indexed citations

20.

Hodson, C. J. & F. A. Duck. (1973). Blood-flow Monitoring in Deeply-situated Arteries. Investigative Radiology. 8(3). 160–166. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact