Hartmut Leppin

618 citations
26 papers · 60 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

    • Byzantine Studies and History 9
    • Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 7
    • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 11
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
    • Historical and Archaeological Studies 2

Hartmut Leppin

16 papers receiving 36 citations

Peers

Hartmut Leppin
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
  • Classics 30
  • Anthropology 37
  • Archeology 26
  • Religious studies 12
  • History 21
Replace E G Clark with:
E G Clark
Benet Salway United Kingdom
Caroline Humfress United Kingdom
Susan Wessel United States
Scott Bradbury
Daniëlle Slootjes Netherlands
Dirk Krausmüller Austria
Maijastina Kahlos Sweden
Françoise Van Haeperen Belgium
Henning Börm Germany
Hartmut Leppin relative to E G Clark E G Clark's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
E G Clark · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hartmut Leppin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hartmut Leppin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hartmut Leppin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hartmut Leppin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hartmut Leppin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hartmut Leppin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hartmut Leppin. The network helps show where Hartmut Leppin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Hartmut Leppin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hartmut Leppin Line = papers co-authored together Hartmut Leppin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199613
2
Justinian: das christliche Experiment
201110
3 19997
4 20124
5 20133
6 20113
7 20152
8 20102
9 20142
10 20072
11 19992
12 19922
13 20112
14
Theodosius der Große
20031
15 20181
16 20221
17 19961
18 20171
19 20191
20 20230

About Hartmut Leppin

Hartmut Leppin is a scholar working on Classics, History, Anthropology, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 60 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (11 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (9 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (7 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (30 citations), Anthropology (37 citations), Archeology (26 citations), Religious studies (12 citations) and History (21 citations). Hartmut Leppin has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Wolfram Brandes, Jan Ν. Bremmer, Stephen Scully and Arlene W. Saxonhouse. Their work appears in journals such as Historische Zeitschrift, Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum / Journal of Ancient Christianity, Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History, Klio and International Journal of the Classical Tradition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact