Harry Boothby
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Personality Traits and Psychology
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 8
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 3
-
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 4
- Co-authors
- Helen Nicholas (7 shared papers)Simon Lovestone (7 shared papers)Richard G. Brown (6 shared papers)A. H. Mann (4 shared papers)Nicola Archer (4 shared papers)Catherine Foy (3 shared papers)Gill Livingston (2 shared papers)John Pilgrim (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (5 papers)Psychological Medicine (3 papers)American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (1 paper)Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (1 paper)Neuroepidemiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGreeceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Harry Boothby
11 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Psychiatry and Mental health 185
- Clinical Psychology 130
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 20
- Philosophy 52
- Physiology 76
Countries citing papers authored by Harry Boothby
This map shows the geographic impact of Harry Boothby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harry Boothby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harry Boothby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harry Boothby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harry Boothby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harry Boothby. The network helps show where Harry Boothby may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Harry Boothby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 46 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 9 |
About Harry Boothby
Harry Boothby is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper) and Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (185 citations), Clinical Psychology (130 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (20 citations), Philosophy (52 citations) and Physiology (76 citations). Harry Boothby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Greece and United States. Frequent co-authors include Helen Nicholas, Simon Lovestone, Richard G. Brown, A. H. Mann, Nicola Archer, Catherine Foy, Gill Livingston, John Pilgrim, Robert Blizard and John D. C. Mellers. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychological Medicine, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Neuroepidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.