Harold M. Hochman
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Accounting
- Co-authors
- George E. PetersonJames JohnsonJames D. RodgersThomas A. BartholdMartin FeldsteinGretchen PetersonShmuel NitzanGordon Tullock
- Topics
- Economic Theory and Institutions (5 papers)Economic theories and models (4 papers)Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayIsrael
In The Last Decade
Harold M. Hochman
14 papers receiving 173 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Economics and Econometrics 154
- Political Science and International Relations 58
- Gender Studies 44
- Sociology and Political Science 35
- Accounting 32
Countries citing papers authored by Harold M. Hochman
This map shows the geographic impact of Harold M. Hochman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harold M. Hochman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harold M. Hochman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harold M. Hochman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harold M. Hochman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harold M. Hochman. The network helps show where Harold M. Hochman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harold M. Hochman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harold M. Hochman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harold M. Hochman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Harold M. Hochman. Harold M. Hochman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pareto Optimal Redistribution: Comment | 1 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Addictive Behavior and Public Policy | 0 |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | The Urban economy | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | La redistribución óptima de Pareto | 1 |
| 13 | 94 | |
| 14 | Redistribution and the Pareto Criterion | 15 |
| 15 | Distributional Preferences in Public Expenditure Analysis | 16 |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Is Efficiency a Criterion for Judging Redistribution | 5 |
| 19 | Professor Head on Equity and Efficiency: Comment and Addendum | 1 |
About Harold M. Hochman
Harold M. Hochman is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 19 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (5 papers), Economic theories and models (4 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (19 citations), Economics and Econometrics (154 citations) and Gender Studies (44 citations). Harold M. Hochman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Israel. Frequent co-authors include George E. Peterson, James Johnson, James D. Rodgers, Thomas A. Barthold, Martin Feldstein, Gretchen Peterson, Shmuel Nitzan, Gordon Tullock, Richard A. Musgrave and Richard Layard. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, The Quarterly Journal of Economics and Urban Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.