Citations per year, relative to Hans Waege Hans Waege (= 1×)
peers
Martin van der Gaag
Countries citing papers authored by Hans Waege
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Waege's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Waege with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Waege more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Waege. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Waege. The network helps show where Hans Waege may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans Waege
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans Waege.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans Waege based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hans Waege. Hans Waege is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lievens, John & Hans Waege. (2005). Cultuurkijker : cultuurparticipatie in breedbeeld. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).5 indexed citations
Agneessens, Filip, Henk Roose, & Hans Waege. (2004). Choices of theatre events. 1(2). 419–439.1 indexed citations
7.
Agneessens, Filip, et al.. (2004). Asking Social Network Questions: A Quality Assessment of Different Measures. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 1(2). 351–378.48 indexed citations
8.
Roose, Henk & Hans Waege. (2003). Van passant tot connaisseur: een empirische studie over de interne gelaagdheid en de esthetische verwachtingen van het hedendaagse theaterpubliek. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).5 indexed citations
9.
Roose, Henk, Hans Waege, & Filip Agneessens. (2002). Response behaviour in audience research. A two-stage design for the explanation of nonresponse. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).3 indexed citations
10.
Roose, Henk, et al.. (2002). Theatre Audience on Stage: Three Experiments Analysing the Effects of Survey Design Features on Survey Response in Audience Research. 1–10.2 indexed citations
11.
Page, Hilary, et al.. (2001). Kernelementen doctoreren in Vlaanderen. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
12.
Waege, Hans & Filip Agneessens. (2001). Impressies over sociale relaties, waarden en tradities. Vijf jaar vragen naar de verhouding tussen individu en gemeenschap.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
13.
Waege, Hans, Stefaan Pleysier, & Jaak Billiet. (2000). Validation by means of method variation: a CFA-approach to SSA-value-typology of Schwartz. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
14.
Waege, Hans & Jaak Billiet. (1998). Individualisme: een kwestie bij de eeuwwende?. Lirias (KU Leuven).2 indexed citations
Waege, Hans & Jaak Billiet. (1996). The validity of unidimensional scales. Different association structures in relevant subgroups of a heterogeneous population. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
18.
Billiet, Jaak, et al.. (1996). Measurement and control of acquiescence in surveys: combining split ballots and structural models. 233–238.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.