Hans Michael Piper

60 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Hans Michael Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 733
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 531
  • Developmental Neuroscience 88
  • Emergency Medicine 164
  • Nephrology 126
Replace Emmanuel S. Buys with:
Emmanuel S. Buys United States
William A. Chutkow United States
Cesario Bianchi United States
Thomas Podzuweit Germany
Heinz‐Gerd Zimmer Germany
Mary O. Gray United States
Gregg D. Rokosh United States
Bruce D. Ziman United States
Shunying Hu China
Hans Michael Piper relative to Emmanuel S. Buys United States Emmanuel S. Buys's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Emmanuel S. Buys · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hans Michael Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Michael Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Michael Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Michael Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hans Michael Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Michael Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Michael Piper. The network helps show where Hans Michael Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hans Michael Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hans Michael Piper Line = papers co-authored together Hans Michael Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016270
2 1996226
3 1998188
4 2001129
5 1990100
6 199993
7 200774
8 200160
9 199959
10 201059
11 200057
12 199956
13 201250
14 200549
15 199448
16 199848
17 200144
18 201041
19 199834
20 200133

About Hans Michael Piper

Hans Michael Piper is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Physiology, Molecular Biology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 64 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (17 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (15 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (14 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (11 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (8 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (7 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (5 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (733 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (531 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (88 citations), Emergency Medicine (164 citations) and Nephrology (126 citations). Hans Michael Piper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and France. Frequent co-authors include Klaus‐Dieter Schlüter, Gerhild Taimor, David García‐Dorado, Yaser Abdallah, Karin Kottenberg, Georg Kojda, Sibylle Wenzel, E. Noack, Thomas Noll and Klaus Schlüter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research, Journal of Vascular Research, Basic Research in Cardiology and Journal of Cellular Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact