Hans Jonker

940 total citations
13 papers, 140 citations indexed

About

Hans Jonker is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Hans Jonker has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 140 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Hans Jonker's work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (9 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (7 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (6 papers). Hans Jonker is often cited by papers focused on Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (9 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (7 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (6 papers). Hans Jonker collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Hans Jonker's co-authors include Patrick W. Serruys, Yoshinobu Onuma, Erhan Tenekecioğlu, Yohei Sotomi, Jouke Dijkstra, Carlos Collet, Ryo Torii, Hiroki Tateishi, Christos V. Bourantas and Eric Poon and has published in prestigious journals such as European Heart Journal, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging and International Journal of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

Hans Jonker

13 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Hans Jonker Netherlands	7	115	85	73	43	13	13	140
Stefan Juričić Serbia	8	114 1.0×	110 1.3×	84 1.2×	34 0.8×	12 0.9×	26	157
Oleg Krestyaninov Russia	4	109 0.9×	80 0.9×	71 1.0×	25 0.6×	7 0.5×	47	132
Tim ten Cate Netherlands	6	97 0.8×	105 1.2×	100 1.4×	31 0.7×	11 0.8×	19	157
C. Cheshire Australia	6	116 1.0×	88 1.0×	109 1.5×	34 0.8×	8 0.6×	11	180
Debabrata Dash India	9	213 1.9×	141 1.7×	120 1.6×	66 1.5×	8 0.6×	37	236
Bülent Mutlu Türkiye	6	52 0.5×	104 1.2×	61 0.8×	36 0.8×	6 0.5×	28	126
Erwan Bressollette France	7	116 1.0×	117 1.4×	75 1.0×	55 1.3×	3 0.2×	12	161
Stewart M. Benton United States	4	50 0.4×	87 1.0×	43 0.6×	66 1.5×	22 1.7×	9	137
Tudor Pörner Germany	5	162 1.4×	112 1.3×	86 1.2×	57 1.3×	9 0.7×	8	179
Giombattista Barrano Italy	8	175 1.5×	145 1.7×	129 1.8×	34 0.8×	7 0.5×	15	199

Countries citing papers authored by Hans Jonker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Jonker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Jonker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Jonker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hans Jonker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Jonker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Jonker. The network helps show where Hans Jonker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans Jonker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans Jonker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans Jonker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans Jonker. Hans Jonker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

Neleman, Tara, et al.. (2022). Validation of a simplified intravascular ultrasound core lab analysis method in stented coronary arteries. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 100(4). 481–491. 1 indexed citations

Jonker, Hans, et al.. (2021). Distinguishing science communication & popularization from research-based public interventions. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 1181–1186. 1 indexed citations

Tenekecioğlu, Erhan, Ryo Torii, Yuki Katagiri, et al.. (2019). Early strut protrusion and late neointima thickness in the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold: a serial wall shear stress analysis up to five years. EuroIntervention. 15(4). e370–e379. 6 indexed citations

Torii, Ryo, Erhan Tenekecioğlu, Yuki Katagiri, et al.. (2019). The impact of plaque type on strut embedment/protrusion and shear stress distribution in bioresorbable scaffold. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. 21(4). 454–462. 5 indexed citations

Thondapu, Vikas, Erhan Tenekecioğlu, Eric Poon, et al.. (2018). Endothelial shear stress 5 years after implantation of a coronary bioresorbable scaffold. European Heart Journal. 39(18). 1602–1609. 31 indexed citations

Sotomi, Yohei, Yoshinobu Onuma, Yosuke Miyazaki, et al.. (2017). Is quantitative coronary angiography reliable in assessing the late lumen loss of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable polylactide scaffold in comparison with the cobalt-chromium metallic stent?. EuroIntervention. 13(5). e585–e594. 5 indexed citations

Zeng, Yaping, Hiroki Tateishi, Rafael Cavalcante, et al.. (2017). Serial Assessment of Tissue Precursors and Progression of Coronary Calcification Analyzed by Fusion of IVUS and OCT. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 10(10). 1151–1161. 26 indexed citations

Soliman, Osama, Nahid El Faquir, Ben Ren, et al.. (2016). Comparison of valve performance of the mechanically expanding Lotus and the balloon-expanded SAPIEN3 transcatheter heart valves: an observational study with independent core laboratory analysis. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. 19(2). 157–167. 11 indexed citations

Abdelghani, Mohammad, Ben Ren, Ernest Spitzer, et al.. (2016). A granular approach to improve reproducibility of the echocardiographic assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after TAVI. International journal of cardiac imaging. 32(10). 1519–1527. 6 indexed citations

10.

Sotomi, Yohei, Yoshinobu Onuma, Pannipa Suwannasom, et al.. (2016). Is quantitative coronary angiography reliable in assessing the lumen gain after treatment with the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable polylactide scaffold?. EuroIntervention. 12(8). e998–e1008. 15 indexed citations

11.

Zeng, Yaping, Rafael Cavalcante, Erhan Tenekecioğlu, et al.. (2016). Comparative assessment of “plaque/media” change on three modalities of IVUS immediately after implantation of either everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold or everolimus-eluting metallic stent in Absorb II study. International journal of cardiac imaging. 33(4). 441–449. 1 indexed citations

12.

Campos, Carlos M., Héctor M. García‐García, David van Klaveren, et al.. (2015). Validity of SYNTAX score II for risk stratification of percutaneous coronary interventions: A patient-level pooled analysis of 5433 patients enrolled in contemporary coronary stent trials. International Journal of Cardiology. 187. 111–115. 22 indexed citations

13.

Muramatsu, Takashi, Maik J. Grundeken, Yuki Ishibashi, et al.. (2015). Comparison between two‐ and three‐dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 86(3). E140–9. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact