Hanny Haaxma-Reiche
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Charles J. VechtPieter E. PostmusMartin J. van den BentMartin TaphoornJ. H. C. VoormolenJ. T. J. TansRonald BrandGeorge W. Padberg
- Topics
- Brain Metastases and Treatment (15 papers)Lung Cancer Research Studies (15 papers)Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumPoland
In The Last Decade
Hanny Haaxma-Reiche
34 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.3k
- Genetics 1.2k
- Oncology 803
- Epidemiology 506
- Neurology 480
Countries citing papers authored by Hanny Haaxma-Reiche
This map shows the geographic impact of Hanny Haaxma-Reiche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hanny Haaxma-Reiche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hanny Haaxma-Reiche more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hanny Haaxma-Reiche
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hanny Haaxma-Reiche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hanny Haaxma-Reiche. The network helps show where Hanny Haaxma-Reiche may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hanny Haaxma-Reiche
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hanny Haaxma-Reiche. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hanny Haaxma-Reiche based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hanny Haaxma-Reiche. Hanny Haaxma-Reiche is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 165 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 68 | |
| 7 | Evidence for reduced premotor cortex metabolism and increased basal ganglia fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in cerebral systemic lupus. | 1 |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 478 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 157 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 63 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Hanny Haaxma-Reiche
Hanny Haaxma-Reiche is a scholar working on Oncology, Genetics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Brain Metastases and Treatment (15 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (15 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.2k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.3k citations) and Neurology (480 citations). Hanny Haaxma-Reiche has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Charles J. Vecht, Pieter E. Postmus, Martin J. van den Bent, Martin Taphoorn, J. H. C. Voormolen, J. T. J. Tans, Ronald Brand, George W. Padberg, Evert M. Noordijk and J. Hermans. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Neurology and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.