Hannes Maier-Flaig
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Hans HueblSebastian T. B. GoennenweinMathias WeilerStefan KlinglerRudolf GroßStephan GeprägsCarsten DubsA. B. Surzhenko
- Topics
- Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (7 papers)Magnetic properties of thin films (6 papers)Mechanical and Optical Resonators (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Hannes Maier-Flaig
13 papers receiving 557 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 509
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 265
- Condensed Matter Physics 122
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 121
- Artificial Intelligence 74
Countries citing papers authored by Hannes Maier-Flaig
This map shows the geographic impact of Hannes Maier-Flaig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannes Maier-Flaig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannes Maier-Flaig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hannes Maier-Flaig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannes Maier-Flaig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannes Maier-Flaig. The network helps show where Hannes Maier-Flaig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannes Maier-Flaig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannes Maier-Flaig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannes Maier-Flaig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannes Maier-Flaig. Hannes Maier-Flaig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 102 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 142 | |
| 4 | Magnetic resonance of ferrimagnetic insulators | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | 73 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 61 | |
| 13 | 62 |
About Hannes Maier-Flaig
Hannes Maier-Flaig is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biophysics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 13 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (7 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (6 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (509 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (122 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (121 citations). Hannes Maier-Flaig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Hans Huebl, Sebastian T. B. Goennenwein, Mathias Weiler, Stefan Klingler, Rudolf Groß, Stephan Geprägs, Carsten Dubs, A. B. Surzhenko, Michael Harder and M. D. Stiles. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Review of Scientific Instruments.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.