Hannah Rettie

604 total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 430 citations indexed

About

Hannah Rettie is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Rettie has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 430 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Epidemiology, 4 papers in Applied Psychology and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Hannah Rettie's work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers). Hannah Rettie is often cited by papers focused on Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers). Hannah Rettie collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Canada. Hannah Rettie's co-authors include Jo Daniels, Lee Hogan and W. Miles Cox and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Addictive Behaviors and Substance Use & Misuse.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Rettie

8 papers receiving 411 citations

Hit Papers

Coping and tolerance of uncertainty: Predictors and media... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300

Peers

Hannah Rettie
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Clinical Psychology 276
  • Social Psychology 133
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
  • Applied Psychology 75
  • General Health Professions 73
Replace Xu Ding with:
Xu Ding China
Macarena del Valle Argentina
Amanda A. Mathis United States
Nikolett Eisenbeck Spain
Gaja Zager Kocjan Slovenia
Victoria M. E. Bridgland Australia
Jeffrey Rettew United States
Shimin Zhu Hong Kong
Ariella Grossman‐Giron Israel
David F. Carreno Spain
Xu Ding China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Hannah Rettie
Hannah Rettie · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Hannah Rettie
Hannah Rettie · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Rettie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Rettie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Rettie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Rettie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Rettie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Rettie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Rettie. The network helps show where Hannah Rettie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Rettie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Rettie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Rettie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Rettie. Hannah Rettie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 2
3
A feasibility study of Moving on in My Recovery: an acceptance-based group programme for people in recovery from substance addiction.
0
4 13
5
Coping and tolerance of uncertainty: Predictors and mediators of mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. breakdown →
381
6 10
7 6
8 7
9 8
10 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026