Hannah Petersen

3.7k total citations
79 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Hannah Petersen is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Petersen has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 72 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 7 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 5 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in Hannah Petersen's work include High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (72 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (59 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (58 papers). Hannah Petersen is often cited by papers focused on High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (72 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (59 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (58 papers). Hannah Petersen collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Hannah Petersen's co-authors include Marcus Bleicher, Long-Gang Pang, H. Stöcker, Xin-Nian Wang, Steffen A. Bass, Jan Steinheimer, Guang-You Qin, Berndt Müller, G. Burau and Dmytro Oliinychenko and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Petersen

76 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hannah Petersen Germany 26 2.2k 338 161 115 86 79 2.4k
K. Hallatschek Germany 19 1.5k 0.7× 1.2k 3.4× 85 0.5× 90 0.8× 30 0.3× 63 1.6k
S. R. Klein United States 28 2.7k 1.2× 320 0.9× 74 0.5× 193 1.7× 142 1.7× 117 3.0k
Adrian Dumitru United States 43 4.8k 2.2× 687 2.0× 140 0.9× 211 1.8× 101 1.2× 132 4.9k
Guillaume Latu France 22 1.1k 0.5× 836 2.5× 185 1.1× 74 0.6× 46 0.5× 84 1.4k
D.P. Stotler United States 26 2.4k 1.1× 1.3k 3.9× 338 2.1× 208 1.8× 49 0.6× 120 2.6k
M. Ottaviani France 24 1.4k 0.6× 1.0k 3.1× 166 1.0× 105 0.9× 74 0.9× 58 1.5k
G. Dif‐Pradalier France 24 1.7k 0.8× 1.2k 3.7× 209 1.3× 85 0.7× 61 0.7× 101 1.8k
Eliezer Hameiri United States 20 737 0.3× 906 2.7× 64 0.4× 98 0.9× 50 0.6× 57 1.4k
V. Grandgirard France 26 2.1k 0.9× 1.5k 4.5× 330 2.0× 113 1.0× 67 0.8× 125 2.3k
M. Greco Italy 29 3.2k 1.5× 125 0.4× 142 0.9× 139 1.2× 29 0.3× 144 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Petersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Petersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Petersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Petersen. The network helps show where Hannah Petersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Petersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Petersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Petersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Petersen. Hannah Petersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Petersen, Hannah, Dmytro Oliinychenko, Markus Mayer, Jan Staudenmaier, & S. Ryu. (2019). SMASH – A new hadronic transport approach. Nuclear Physics A. 982. 399–402. 20 indexed citations
2.
Blaschke, D., Marcus Bleicher, Yu. B. Ivanov, et al.. (2018). Three-fluid Hydrodynamics-based Event Simulator Extended by UrQMD final State interactions (THESEUS) for FAIR-NICA-SPSBES/RHIC energies. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 6 indexed citations
3.
Albacete, Javier L., Hannah Petersen, & Alba Soto-Ontoso. (2018). Symmetric cumulants as a probe of the proton substructure at LHC energies. Physics Letters B. 778. 128–136. 16 indexed citations
4.
Pang, Long-Gang, Kai Zhou, Nan Su, et al.. (2018). An equation-of-state-meter of quantum chromodynamics transition from deep learning. Nature Communications. 9(1). 210–210. 125 indexed citations
5.
Tindall, Joseph, et al.. (2017). Equilibration and freeze-out of an expanding gas in a transport approach in a Friedmann–Robertson–Walker metric. Physics Letters B. 770. 532–538. 10 indexed citations
7.
Pang, Long-Gang, Kai Zhou, Nan Su, et al.. (2016). An EoS-meter of QCD transition from deep learning. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
8.
Pang, Long-Gang, Hannah Petersen, Qun Wang, & Xin-Nian Wang. (2016). Vortical Fluid and Λ Spin Correlations in High-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions. Physical Review Letters. 117(19). 192301–192301. 142 indexed citations
9.
Weil, Janus, Jan Staudenmaier, & Hannah Petersen. (2016). Dilepton production with the SMASH model. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 742. 12034–12034. 7 indexed citations
10.
Auvinen, Jussi & Hannah Petersen. (2013). Evolution of elliptic and triangular flow as a function ofsNNin a hybrid model. Physical Review C. 88(6). 37 indexed citations
11.
Adare, A., Matthew Luzum, & Hannah Petersen. (2013). Initial state fluctuations and final state correlations: status and open questions. Physica Scripta. 87(4). 48001–48001. 12 indexed citations
12.
Petersen, Hannah, Rolando L. La Placa, & Steffen A. Bass. (2012). A systematic study of the sensitivity of triangular flow to the initial state fluctuations in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 39(5). 55102–55102. 19 indexed citations
13.
Petersen, Hannah. (2011). Initial-state fluctuations at the RHIC and the LHC in event-by-event ideal hydrodynamics. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 38(12). 124122–124122. 2 indexed citations
14.
Steinheimer, Jan, Hannah Petersen, M. K. Mitrovski, & Marcus Bleicher. (2010). Strangeness production at SPS energies in a (3+1)-dimensional Boltzmann+hydrodynamics approach. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 37(9). 94038–94038. 1 indexed citations
15.
Steinheimer, Jan, Hannah Petersen, G. Burau, Marcus Bleicher, & Horst Stoecker. (2009). Strangeness Production and Local Thermalization in an Integrated Boltzmann + Hydrodynamics Approach. Acta Physica Polonica B. 40(4). 999. 1 indexed citations
16.
Li, Qingfeng, Jan Steinheimer, Hannah Petersen, Marcus Bleicher, & H. Stöcker. (2009). Effects of a phase transition on HBT correlations in an integrated Boltzmann+hydrodynamics approach. Physics Letters B. 674(2). 111–116. 37 indexed citations
18.
Steinheimer, Jan, Marcus Bleicher, Hannah Petersen, et al.. (2008). (3+1)-dimensional hydrodynamic expansion with a critical point from realistic initial conditions. Physical Review C. 77(3). 62 indexed citations
19.
Petersen, Hannah, et al.. (2006). Directed and elliptic flow in heavy ion collisions at GSI-FAIR and CERN-SPS. arXiv (Cornell University). 5 indexed citations
20.
Petersen, Hannah, et al.. (1993). Phase-slip analysis of the non-Ohmic transition in granularYBa2Cu3O6.9. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 48(5). 3388–3392. 59 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026