Hannah Barrow

718 citations
13 papers · 542 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Galectins and Cancer Biology 6
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 5
    • Signaling Pathways in Disease 2
    • Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases 2

Hannah Barrow

11 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Hannah Barrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Immunology 360
  • Otorhinolaryngology 35
  • Oncology 152
  • Molecular Biology 342
  • Cancer Research 27
Replace Irmi Wiest with:
Irmi Wiest Germany
Reshmi Parameswaran United States
Daisuke Hazama Japan
H Furue Japan
Sei Kyung Chang South Korea
Shannon Zhang United States
Arnold Baars Netherlands
Elham Alsahafi Saudi Arabia
Gunjan Srivastava India
Corey Carter United States
Hannah Barrow relative to Irmi Wiest Germany Irmi Wiest's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Irmi Wiest · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Barrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Barrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Barrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Barrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Barrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Barrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Barrow. The network helps show where Hannah Barrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hannah Barrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hannah Barrow Line = papers co-authored together Hannah Barrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2010177
2 2011139
3 201187
4 199236
5 201233
6 201328
7 200522
8 20149
9 19948
10 20202
11 20231
12 20180
13 20210

About Hannah Barrow

Hannah Barrow is a scholar working on Immunology, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galectins and Cancer Biology (6 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (5 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (2 papers), Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases (2 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (1 paper), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (360 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (35 citations), Oncology (152 citations), Molecular Biology (342 citations) and Cancer Research (27 citations). Hannah Barrow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan M. Rhodes, Lu‐Gang Yu, Qicheng Zhao, Xiuli Guo, John Hilkens, Mark J. Levenson, Johannes W. Pedersen, Chen Chen, Bo Fu and Hans H. Wandall. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Cancer Research, International Journal of Surgery, BDJ, Journal of Medical Ethics and Cellular Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact