Countries where authors publish in Cellular Oncology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cellular Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cellular Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cellular Oncology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cellular Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cellular Oncology.
About Cellular Oncology
The 1.1k papers published in Cellular Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 24.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Cellular Oncology usually cover Cancer Research (112 papers), Oncology (158 papers), Molecular Biology (240 papers), Immunology (57 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (49 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Cells and Metastasis (40 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (31 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (29 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (26 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (21 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (20 papers), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (18 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cellular Oncology are Roman Paduch, Sharanjot Saini, Keywan Mortezaee, Jamal Majidpoor, Paul J van Diest, Ovidiu Bălăcescu, Daniel Cruceriu, Oana Baldasici, Arash Salmaninejad and Kah Keng Wong.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.