H. Wagner
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 5%
- Food Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter WolffK. JurcicA. SendlW. BreuK. RedlMichael WiererAndrás NeszmélyiAlain Bertrand Dongmo
- Topics
- Garlic and Onion Studies (5 papers)Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers)Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
H. Wagner
20 papers receiving 678 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Plant Science 401
- Molecular Biology 288
- Pharmacology 134
- Complementary and alternative medicine 126
- Food Science 103
Countries citing papers authored by H. Wagner
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Wagner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. Wagner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Wagner. The network helps show where H. Wagner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Wagner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Wagner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Wagner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Wagner. H. Wagner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 106 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 59 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | [Detection and quantitative determination of lectins and viscotoxins in mistletoe preparations]. | 8 |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | Viscum album ヤドリギ 液体クロマトグラフおよび他のクロマトグラフ法による薬物および生薬の分析と標準化 | 4 |
| 17 | Chemistry, 13C-NMR study and pharmacology of two saponins from Colubrina asiatica. | 40 |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 272 | |
| 20 | [On determination of the value of garlic preparations. 1. Chromatographic studies on the genuine contents of Allium sativum L]. | 1 |
About H. Wagner
H. Wagner is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Biochemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 749 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Garlic and Onion Studies (5 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers) and Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (134 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (126 citations) and Plant Science (401 citations). H. Wagner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Cameroon and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Peter Wolff, K. Jurcic, A. Sendl, W. Breu, K. Redl, Michael Wierer, András Neszmélyi, Alain Bertrand Dongmo, Nolé Tsabang and Albert Kamanyi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Journal of Ethnopharmacology and Phytotherapy Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.