H. Struck

53 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

H. Struck
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Rehabilitation 34
  • Dermatology 28
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 26
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 26
  • Nephrology 17
Replace Green with:
Green Australia
S. V. S. Krishna India
Yulin Chen China
Kohji Yano Japan
Abdul Halim Japan
A. Avram United States
Hrvoje Vrčić Croatia
Geesje H. Kiers Netherlands
Madden Jw United States
Yijie Duan China
H. Struck relative to Green Australia Green's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Green · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Struck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Struck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Struck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Struck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Struck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Struck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Struck. The network helps show where H. Struck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Struck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Struck Line = papers co-authored together H. Struck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197147
2 197933
3 196118
4 201115
5 197714
6 197214
7 198712
8 197410
9 19749
10 19689
11 19778
12 19767
13 19777
14 19776
15 19586
16 19656
17
The effect of rifamycin SV on the wound-healing process.
19766
18 19776
19
[Promotion of fracture healing through local use of collagen].
19726
20 19746

About H. Struck

H. Struck is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Occupational Therapy, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Surgery, having authored 62 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (10 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (6 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (5 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (3 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (3 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (3 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (3 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (34 citations), Dermatology (28 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (26 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (26 citations) and Nephrology (17 citations). H. Struck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Nagelschmidt, Th. Unger, J. M. Hower, W. Tackmann, H. Karg, Holger Bohlmann, T Unger, H. Jork, Matthew Ho and Ralf Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hormone and Metabolic Research and Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact