Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephan RuhrmannJoachim KlosterkötterFrauke Schultze‐LutterRalf PukropAndreas BechdolfIndira TendolkarMitja BodatschJ. Klosterkoetter
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (17 papers)Neuroscience and Music Perception (8 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke
30 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Cognitive Neuroscience 990
- Psychiatry and Mental health 945
- Philosophy 330
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 231
- Clinical Psychology 203
Countries citing papers authored by Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke
This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke. The network helps show where Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke. Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 92 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 156 | |
| 10 | 70 | |
| 11 | 184 | |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 91 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 160 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 133 |
About Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke
Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (17 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (8 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (945 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (990 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (124 citations). Anke Brockhaus‐Dumke has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Stephan Ruhrmann, Joachim Klosterkötter, Frauke Schultze‐Lutter, Ralf Pukrop, Andreas Bechdolf, Indira Tendolkar, Mitja Bodatsch, J. Klosterkoetter, Michael Wagner and Wolfgang Gäebel. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Brain Research and Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.