H. Prichard

548 total citations
7 papers, 411 citations indexed

About

H. Prichard is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, H. Prichard has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 411 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 3 papers in Radiation and 2 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in H. Prichard's work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper). H. Prichard is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper). H. Prichard collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. H. Prichard's co-authors include Padraig Warde, Richard Choo, Mark N. Levine, Winkle Kwan, Jim A. Julian, Jinka Sathya, William Morris, Michael Brundage, Mary Gospodarowicz and Himu Lukka and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and European Urology.

In The Last Decade

H. Prichard

7 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
H. Prichard Canada	5	367	194	74	57	56	7	411
Gad A. Perry Canada	6	354 1.0×	128 0.7×	27 0.4×	18 0.3×	67 1.2×	7	457
Qiuan Yang China	11	311 0.8×	178 0.9×	36 0.5×	109 1.9×	131 2.3×	23	445
Caitlin A. Schonewolf United States	10	209 0.6×	90 0.5×	49 0.7×	96 1.7×	74 1.3×	37	376
Goro Kasuya Japan	12	220 0.6×	120 0.6×	23 0.3×	98 1.7×	91 1.6×	20	345
K.C. Dallow United States	6	471 1.3×	163 0.8×	21 0.3×	18 0.3×	78 1.4×	9	504
A.C.M. van den Bergh Netherlands	9	152 0.4×	70 0.4×	30 0.4×	107 1.9×	112 2.0×	19	400
Lluís Escudé Spain	12	231 0.6×	257 1.3×	13 0.2×	102 1.8×	91 1.6×	18	398
D. Lombardi United States	5	567 1.5×	400 2.1×	21 0.3×	125 2.2×	84 1.5×	6	653
Ritsuko Komaki United States	7	488 1.3×	122 0.6×	22 0.3×	90 1.6×	50 0.9×	17	570
Jeffrey Michalski United States	6	474 1.3×	213 1.1×	12 0.2×	60 1.1×	84 1.5×	8	525

Countries citing papers authored by H. Prichard

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Prichard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Prichard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Prichard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Prichard

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Prichard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Prichard. The network helps show where H. Prichard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Prichard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Prichard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Prichard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Prichard. H. Prichard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Nakamura, Akira, H. Prichard, Jennifer Y. Wo, John A. Wolfgang, & Theodore S. Hong. (2019). Elective nodal irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Analyses of planning feasibility and geometrically driven DVH prediction model. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 20(2). 71–83. 5 indexed citations

2.

Tanguturi, Shyam, Andrzej Niemierko, Jennifer Y. Wo, et al.. (2017). Gallbladder toxicity and high-dose ablative-intent radiation for liver tumors: Should we constrain the dose?. Practical Radiation Oncology. 7(5). e323–e329. 4 indexed citations

3.

Machtay, Mitchell, Diáne Hershock, Robert A. Lustig, et al.. (2012). Long-term Outcomes from RTOG 99-03: Radiation Therapy With or Without Erythropoietin for Anemic Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 84(3). S21–S21. 1 indexed citations

4.

Lukka, Himu, Charles Hayter, Jim A. Julian, et al.. (2005). Randomized Trial Comparing Two Fractionation Schedules for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 23(25). 6132–6138. 276 indexed citations

5.

Lightfoot, Nancy, Michael Conlon, Nancy Kreiger, et al.. (2000). Impact of Noninvasive Imaging on Increased Incidental Detection of Renal Cell Carcinoma. European Urology. 37(5). 521–527. 100 indexed citations

6.

Carey, Mark S., et al.. (1994). Conservative Surgery for Recurrent or Persistent Carcinoma of the Cervix Following Irradiation: Is Exenteration Always Necessary?. Gynecologic Oncology. 52(3). 353–359. 21 indexed citations

7.

Prichard, H., et al.. (1981). Radionuclide assessment of extravascular lung water in minimal pulmonary oedema. Clinical Radiology. 32(6). 607–609. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact