H. Kim Jerome
About
In The Last Decade
H. Kim Jerome
5 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Infectious Diseases 176
- Molecular Biology 72
- Epidemiology 65
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 63
- Immunology 42
Countries citing papers authored by H. Kim Jerome
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Kim Jerome's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Kim Jerome with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Kim Jerome more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. Kim Jerome
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Kim Jerome. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Kim Jerome. The network helps show where H. Kim Jerome may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Kim Jerome
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Kim Jerome. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Kim Jerome based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Kim Jerome. H. Kim Jerome is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 126 | |
| 4 | Can we identify potential viral zoonoses before they cross the species barrier | 0 |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 73 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.