H. Hannah Nam
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Communication top 10%
- Co-authors
- John T. JostJay J. Van BavelErin P. HennesChadly SternDavid M. AmodioDaniel Campbell-MeiklejohnKatherine SawyerMichael R. Meager
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPolitical Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
H. Hannah Nam
15 papers receiving 399 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Sociology and Political Science 325
- Social Psychology 207
- Cognitive Neuroscience 108
- Political Science and International Relations 53
- Communication 43
Countries citing papers authored by H. Hannah Nam
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Hannah Nam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Hannah Nam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Hannah Nam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. Hannah Nam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Hannah Nam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Hannah Nam. The network helps show where H. Hannah Nam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Hannah Nam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Hannah Nam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Hannah Nam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Hannah Nam. H. Hannah Nam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 89 | |
| 12 | Which American way? Overcoming resistance to change through system-sanctioned appeals | 1 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 62 | |
| 15 | 164 |
About H. Hannah Nam
H. Hannah Nam is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (207 citations), Sociology and Political Science (325 citations) and Communication (43 citations). H. Hannah Nam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John T. Jost, Jay J. Van Bavel, Erin P. Hennes, Chadly Stern, David M. Amodio, Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn, Katherine Sawyer, Michael R. Meager, Robert M. Sapolsky and Stanley Feldman. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Political Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.