Corrie V. Hunt

491 total citations
10 papers, 305 citations indexed

About

Corrie V. Hunt is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Corrie V. Hunt has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 305 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Corrie V. Hunt's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers). Corrie V. Hunt is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers). Corrie V. Hunt collaborates with scholars based in United States. Corrie V. Hunt's co-authors include Christopher M. Federico, Damla Ergun, Christopher Weber, Eugene Borgida, Emily L. Fisher and Shelly Chaiken and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Journal of Social Issues and Political Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Corrie V. Hunt

10 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Corrie V. Hunt United States 7 241 149 86 72 33 10 305
Patrizia Milesi Italy 11 202 0.8× 92 0.6× 64 0.7× 37 0.5× 65 2.0× 21 316
Caitlin Davies New Zealand 6 188 0.8× 86 0.6× 82 1.0× 101 1.4× 57 1.7× 7 290
H. Hannah Nam United States 9 325 1.3× 207 1.4× 108 1.3× 53 0.7× 43 1.3× 15 416
Roomana N. Siddiqui India 5 454 1.9× 267 1.8× 74 0.9× 46 0.6× 67 2.0× 8 534
Mike Gruszczynski United States 11 258 1.1× 71 0.5× 69 0.8× 78 1.1× 120 3.6× 22 384
S. Reicher United Kingdom 4 295 1.2× 143 1.0× 23 0.3× 59 0.8× 57 1.7× 7 371
Peter Kardoš United States 8 141 0.6× 74 0.5× 31 0.4× 25 0.3× 23 0.7× 16 224
Omair Akhtar United States 5 251 1.0× 94 0.6× 40 0.5× 126 1.8× 26 0.8× 7 322
Brandon Warmke United States 11 185 0.8× 145 1.0× 164 1.9× 51 0.7× 26 0.8× 25 403
Sharareh Noorbaloochi United States 6 258 1.1× 170 1.1× 126 1.5× 38 0.5× 37 1.1× 6 369

Countries citing papers authored by Corrie V. Hunt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Corrie V. Hunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Corrie V. Hunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Corrie V. Hunt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Corrie V. Hunt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Corrie V. Hunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Corrie V. Hunt. The network helps show where Corrie V. Hunt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Corrie V. Hunt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Corrie V. Hunt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Corrie V. Hunt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Corrie V. Hunt. Corrie V. Hunt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Federico, Christopher M., Damla Ergun, & Corrie V. Hunt. (2014). Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 17(4). 524–541. 22 indexed citations
3.
Federico, Christopher M., Christopher Weber, Damla Ergun, & Corrie V. Hunt. (2013). Mapping the Connections between Politics and Morality: The Multiple Sociopolitical Orientations Involved in Moral Intuition. Political Psychology. 34(4). 589–610. 123 indexed citations
4.
Federico, Christopher M. & Corrie V. Hunt. (2011). Political Information, Political Involvement, and Reliance on Ideology in Political Evaluation. Political Behavior. 35(1). 89–112. 44 indexed citations
5.
Federico, Christopher M. & Corrie V. Hunt. (2010). Political Information, Personal Involvement, and Reliance on Ideology in Political Evaluation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
6.
Ergun, Damla, Christopher M. Federico, Corrie V. Hunt, & Christopher Weber. (2010). Reconsidering the Moral Foundations of Ideology. 1 indexed citations
7.
Hunt, Corrie V., et al.. (2010). Revisiting the self-interest versus values debate: The role of temporal perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 46(6). 1155–1158. 29 indexed citations
8.
Federico, Christopher M., Corrie V. Hunt, & Damla Ergun. (2009). Political Expertise, Social Worldviews, and Ideology: Translating “Competitive Jungles” and “Dangerous Worlds” into Ideological Reality. Social Justice Research. 22(2-3). 259–279. 47 indexed citations
9.
Hunt, Corrie V., et al.. (2008). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AFFECTIVE STATES AND THE STRUCTURE OF POLITICAL ATTITUDES. 7–28. 3 indexed citations
10.
Borgida, Eugene, et al.. (2005). On the Use of Gender Stereotyping Research in Sex Discrimination Litigation. eYLS (Yale Law School). 13(2). 6. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026