This map shows the geographic impact of H. C. Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. C. Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. C. Garner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. C. Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. C. Garner. The network helps show where H. C. Garner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. C. Garner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. C. Garner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. C. Garner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H. C. Garner. H. C. Garner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sénik, Claudia, H. C. Garner, & Dominique Méda. (2012). La difficile conciliation entre vie professionnelle et vie familiale. Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine).2 indexed citations
3.
Garner, H. C., Dominique Méda, & Claudia Sénik. (2006). La place du travail dans les identités. Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics. 393(1). 21–40.30 indexed citations
4.
Garner, H. C. & Dominique Méda. (2006). La place du travail dans l'identité des personnes. Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine).2 indexed citations
5.
Garner, H. C., Dominique Méda, & Claudia Sénik. (2005). Conciliation entre vie professionnelle et vie familiale, les leçons des enquêtes auprès des ménages. Travail et emploi.15 indexed citations
6.
Garner, H. C.. (1976). A practical approach to the prediction of oscillatory pressure distributions on wings in supercritical flow.1 indexed citations
Garner, H. C., et al.. (1971). Subsonic theoretical lift-curve slope, aerodynamic centre and spanwise loading for arbitrary aspect ratio, taper ratio and sweepback.1 indexed citations
9.
Garner, H. C.. (1971). Theoretical use of variable porosity in slotted tunnels for minimizing wall interference on dynamic measurements.1 indexed citations
10.
Garner, H. C., et al.. (1968). Comparison of Three Methods for the Evaluation of Subsonic Lifting-Surface Theory.14 indexed citations
11.
Garner, H. C.. (1968). Numerical appraisal of multhopp's low-frequency subsonic lifting-surface theory.2 indexed citations
12.
Garner, H. C., et al.. (1966). SUBSONIC WIND TUNNEL WALL CORRECTIONS. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).126 indexed citations
Garner, H. C., et al.. (1964). THE ESTIMATION OF OSCILLATORY WING AND CONTROL DERIVATIVES. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).1 indexed citations
15.
Garner, H. C., et al.. (1963). Non-linear theory of steady forces on wings with leading-edge flow separation.8 indexed citations
16.
Garner, H. C., et al.. (1963). Pitching derivatives for a gothic wing oscillating about a mean incidence.2 indexed citations
17.
Garner, H. C., et al.. (1955). Pressure probes selected for three-dimensional flow measurement.9 indexed citations
18.
Garner, H. C.. (1952). Multhopp's subsonic lifting-surface theory of wings in slow pitching oscillations.10 indexed citations
19.
Bryant, Lynwood & H. C. Garner. (1951). Control testing in wind tunnels.
20.
Garner, H. C. & Lynwood Bryant. (1951). Swept-wing loading a critical comparison of four subsonic vortex sheet theories.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.