Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Who Compares to Whom? The Anatomy of Income Comparisons in Europe
2010419 citationsAndrew E. Clark, Claudia Sénikprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia Sénik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia Sénik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia Sénik more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia Sénik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia Sénik. The network helps show where Claudia Sénik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia Sénik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia Sénik.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia Sénik based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia Sénik. Claudia Sénik is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Georgieff, Alexandre, et al.. (2019). Undoing Gender with Institutions: Lessons from the German Division and Reunification. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Sénik, Claudia, et al.. (2019). The Impact of the Socialist Episode on Gender Norms in Germany. Econstor (Econstor). 17(3). 30–35.2 indexed citations
Algan, Yann, et al.. (2015). Big Data Measures of Well-Being: Evidence from a Google Well-Being Index in the US. SPIRE (Sciences Po).1 indexed citations
13.
Sénik, Claudia, H. C. Garner, & Dominique Méda. (2012). La difficile conciliation entre vie professionnelle et vie familiale. Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine).2 indexed citations
14.
Clark, Andrew E., Richard Layard, & Claudia Sénik. (2012). The causes of happiness and misery. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 59–89.69 indexed citations
Sénik, Claudia & Thierry Verdier. (2008). Segregation, Entrepreneurship and Work Values: The Case of France. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
17.
Garner, H. C., Dominique Méda, & Claudia Sénik. (2006). La place du travail dans les identités. Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics. 393(1). 21–40.30 indexed citations
18.
Garner, H. C., Dominique Méda, & Claudia Sénik. (2005). Conciliation entre vie professionnelle et vie familiale, les leçons des enquêtes auprès des ménages. Travail et emploi.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.