H. B. Acton

433 citations
21 papers · 149 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

H. B. Acton

19 papers receiving 92 citations

Peers

H. B. Acton
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Philosophy 32
  • History and Philosophy of Science 9
  • Sociology and Political Science 68
  • Political Science and International Relations 36
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 19
Replace Donald A. Cress with:
Donald A. Cress
John J. Ansbro United States
Thomas A. Spragens United States
David S. Stern United States
Warren Weinstein Australia
Derrick Darby United States
Burleigh Taylor Wilkins United States
Augustine Augustine United States
Richard Strier United States
Linda Levy Peck United States
H. B. Acton relative to Donald A. Cress Donald A. Cress's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Donald A. Cress · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. B. Acton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. B. Acton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. B. Acton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. B. Acton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. B. Acton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. B. Acton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. B. Acton. The network helps show where H. B. Acton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside H. B. Acton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. B. Acton Line = papers co-authored together H. B. Acton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Philosophy of Punishment
196924
2
Utilitarianism Liberty ; Representative Government ; Selections From Auguste Comte and Positivism
197217
3 197015
4 195513
5 195612
6 19519
7
The Morals of Markets and Related Essays
19719
8
The philosophy of punishment : a collection of papers
19697
9 19737
10 19706
11 19724
12 19554
13 19654
14 19534
15 19663
16
Symposium: Negative Utilitarianism
19633
17
The morals of markets: An ethical exploration
19713
18 19683
19
WALSH, W. H. - An Introduction to Philosophy of History
19531
20
The ethics of capitalism
19721

About H. B. Acton

H. B. Acton is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 21 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (1 paper), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper), War, Ethics, and Justification (1 paper) and Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (32 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations), Sociology and Political Science (68 citations), Political Science and International Relations (36 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (19 citations). H. B. Acton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Stuart Mill, John Plamenatz, G. A. Cohen, Jeremy Shearmur, David Gordon and Zoe Jordan. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy, Political Studies, Mind and British Journal of Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact