Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Studies Comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for Assessment of Pain Intensity in Adults: A Systematic Literature Review
20111.9k citationsAugusto Caraceni, G.W. Hanks et al.Journal of Pain and Symptom Managementprofile →
Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: the EAPC recommendations
2001590 citationsG.W. Hanks, Franco De Conno et al.British Journal of Cancerprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G.W. Hanks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.W. Hanks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.W. Hanks more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.W. Hanks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.W. Hanks. The network helps show where G.W. Hanks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.W. Hanks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.W. Hanks.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.W. Hanks based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G.W. Hanks. G.W. Hanks is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pigni, Alessandra, Cinzia Brunelli, Jane Gibbins, et al.. (2010). Content development for EUROPEAN GUIDELINES on the use of opioids for cancer pain: a systematic review and Expert Consensus Study.. PubMed. 76(10). 833–43.26 indexed citations
Hanks, G.W., Franco De Conno, Nathan I. Cherny, et al.. (2002). Morfina y opiáceos alternativos para el tratamiento del dolor oncológico: recomendaciones de la EAPC. Medicina Paliativa. 9(1). 22–29.6 indexed citations
8.
Hanks, G.W., Franco De Conno, Nathan I. Cherny, et al.. (2001). Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: the EAPC recommendations. British Journal of Cancer. 84(5). 587–593.590 indexed citations breakdown →
Bloomfield, Saul S. & G.W. Hanks. (1981). The visual analogue scale.. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 11(1). 98–98.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.