Guus ten Broeke
- Global and Planetary Change
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- A. LigtenbergJaap MolenaarM.K. van IttersumDawit SolomonRenske HijbeekVeronique De SyMarloes P. van LoonH.F.M. ten Berge
- Topics
- Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (4 papers)Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers)Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Science and Operations ResearchModeling and SimulationGlobal and Planetary Change
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsKenya
In The Last Decade
Guus ten Broeke
11 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Global and Planetary Change 70
- Management Science and Operations Research 60
- Sociology and Political Science 44
- Economics and Econometrics 42
- Ecology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Guus ten Broeke
This map shows the geographic impact of Guus ten Broeke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guus ten Broeke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guus ten Broeke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guus ten Broeke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guus ten Broeke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guus ten Broeke. The network helps show where Guus ten Broeke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guus ten Broeke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guus ten Broeke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guus ten Broeke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Guus ten Broeke. Guus ten Broeke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 64 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 160 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | Sensitivity analysis for agent-based models: a low complexity test-case | 7 |
| 10 | A spatially explicit agent-based model of opinion and reputation dynamics | 2 |
| 11 | Using an agent-based model to study the effects of enforced quota for sustainable tuna fishery | 1 |
| 12 | Concepts and methods for sensitivity analysis of agent-based models | 2 |
About Guus ten Broeke
Guus ten Broeke is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 12 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers) and Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (60 citations), Modeling and Simulation (20 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (70 citations). Guus ten Broeke has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include A. Ligtenberg, Jaap Molenaar, M.K. van Ittersum, Dawit Solomon, Renske Hijbeek, Veronique De Sy, Marloes P. van Loon, H.F.M. ten Berge, George A.K. van Voorn and G.A.K. van Voorn. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Global Change Biology and Fisheries Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.