Guoping Huang
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Shakeh MomartinLan ZhaoYalin ZhangLianqing ZhangYingxue GaoShuming ShiXiaoqi HuangLemao Liu
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers)Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (6 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Guoping Huang
34 papers receiving 248 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Clinical Psychology 121
- Cognitive Neuroscience 56
- Psychiatry and Mental health 38
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 34
- General Health Professions 30
Countries citing papers authored by Guoping Huang
This map shows the geographic impact of Guoping Huang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guoping Huang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guoping Huang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guoping Huang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guoping Huang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guoping Huang. The network helps show where Guoping Huang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guoping Huang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guoping Huang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guoping Huang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Guoping Huang. Guoping Huang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | Comparative Study on the Clinical Effect and the Life Quality of Schizophrenic Patients Treated with Aripiprazol and Clozepine. | 1 |
| 20 | Life events, social support and attitude to domestic violence of perpetrators | 1 |
About Guoping Huang
Guoping Huang is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medical Services and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 36 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (6 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (121 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (11 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (56 citations). Guoping Huang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Shakeh Momartin, Lan Zhao, Yalin Zhang, Yalin Zhang, Lianqing Zhang, Yingxue Gao, Shuming Shi, Xiaoqi Huang, Lemao Liu and Ming Wei. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Immunology, The Journal of Pediatrics and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.