Gülşen Akman‐Demir
- Neurology top 2%
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Rheumatology top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Erdem TüzünMurat KürtüncüMefkûre EraksoyAksel SıvaGüher Saruhan‐DireskeneliSibel P. YentürPiraye OflazerSema İçöz
- Topics
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (24 papers)Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (19 papers)Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (13 papers)
- Cited by
- OphthalmologyNeurologyRheumatology
- Partner nations
- TürkiyeUnited KingdomTunisia
In The Last Decade
Gülşen Akman‐Demir
49 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Neurology 754
- Ophthalmology 712
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 501
- Rheumatology 473
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 221
Countries citing papers authored by Gülşen Akman‐Demir
This map shows the geographic impact of Gülşen Akman‐Demir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gülşen Akman‐Demir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gülşen Akman‐Demir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gülşen Akman‐Demir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gülşen Akman‐Demir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gülşen Akman‐Demir. The network helps show where Gülşen Akman‐Demir may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gülşen Akman‐Demir
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gülşen Akman‐Demir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gülşen Akman‐Demir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gülşen Akman‐Demir. Gülşen Akman‐Demir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 54 | |
| 14 | Devic's neuromyelitis optica: Prognostic implications of NMO IgG status in Turkish patients | 2 |
| 15 | 94 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About Gülşen Akman‐Demir
Gülşen Akman‐Demir is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (24 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (19 papers) and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (712 citations), Neurology (754 citations) and Rheumatology (473 citations). Gülşen Akman‐Demir has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United Kingdom and Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include Erdem Tüzün, Murat Kürtüncü, Mefkûre Eraksoy, Aksel Sıva, Güher Saruhan‐Direskeneli, Sibel P. Yentür, Piraye Oflazer, Sema İçöz, Melike Mutlu and Sabahattin Saip. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Neurology and Epilepsia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.