Gulab S. Thakur
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science top 10%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Bhagwan S. SanodiyaPrashant BisenPrakash S. BisenGoli Penchala PrasadMousumi DebnathG. B. K. S. PrasadG. V. R. PrasadRohit Sharma
- Topics
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers)Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers)Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- India
In The Last Decade
Gulab S. Thakur
14 papers receiving 887 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Pharmacology 500
- Molecular Biology 344
- Plant Science 320
- Pharmacology 186
- Complementary and alternative medicine 153
Countries citing papers authored by Gulab S. Thakur
This map shows the geographic impact of Gulab S. Thakur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gulab S. Thakur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gulab S. Thakur more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gulab S. Thakur
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gulab S. Thakur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gulab S. Thakur. The network helps show where Gulab S. Thakur may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gulab S. Thakur
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gulab S. Thakur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gulab S. Thakur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gulab S. Thakur. Gulab S. Thakur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | In vitro induction of tuber formation for the synthesis of secondary metabolites in Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant. et Fernand | 8 |
| 4 | TINOSPORA CORDIFOLIA: A CLIMBING SHRUB IN HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT | 17 |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 244 | |
| 9 | 89 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 64 | |
| 12 | 356 | |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | A study of noise around an educational institutional area. | 12 |
About Gulab S. Thakur
Gulab S. Thakur is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Complementary and alternative medicine and Biotechnology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (2 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (500 citations), Pharmacology (186 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (153 citations). Gulab S. Thakur has collaborated with scholars based in India. Frequent co-authors include Bhagwan S. Sanodiya, Prashant Bisen, Prakash S. Bisen, Goli Penchala Prasad, Mousumi Debnath, G. B. K. S. Prasad, G. V. R. Prasad, Rohit Sharma, Gbks Prasad and Anjana Sharma. Their work appears in journals such as Current Medicinal Chemistry, Biotechnology Letters and Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.