Guillermo Gómez‐Peña
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 2%
- Urban Studies top 10%
- Education
- Co-authors
- David William FosterEduardo MendietaDiana TaylorAlexis M. McKeeSharon PattonRichard SchechnerEugênio BarbaMicki McGee
- Topics
- Theatre and Performance Studies (5 papers)Latin American and Latino Studies (3 papers)Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustria
In The Last Decade
Guillermo Gómez‐Peña
20 papers receiving 105 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Sociology and Political Science 60
- Cultural Studies 59
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 49
- Urban Studies 18
- Education 18
Countries citing papers authored by Guillermo Gómez‐Peña
This map shows the geographic impact of Guillermo Gómez‐Peña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guillermo Gómez‐Peña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guillermo Gómez‐Peña more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Guillermo Gómez‐Peña
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guillermo Gómez‐Peña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guillermo Gómez‐Peña. The network helps show where Guillermo Gómez‐Peña may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guillermo Gómez‐Peña
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guillermo Gómez‐Peña. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guillermo Gómez‐Peña based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Guillermo Gómez‐Peña. Guillermo Gómez‐Peña is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | Chicano Interneta: The search for intelligent life in cyberspace | 2 |
| 9 | A Latino Philosopher Interviews a Chicano Performance Artist | 2 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Temple of confessions : Mexican beasts and living santos | 4 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | A legacy of promises : agriculture, politics, and ritual in the Morelos highlands of Mexico | 0 |
About Guillermo Gómez‐Peña
Guillermo Gómez‐Peña is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cultural Studies and Music, having authored 34 papers that have together received 177 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (5 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (3 papers) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (49 citations), Cultural Studies (59 citations) and Music (16 citations). Guillermo Gómez‐Peña has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include David William Foster, Eduardo Mendieta, Diana Taylor, Alexis M. McKee, Sharon Patton, Richard Schechner, Eugênio Barba, Micki McGee and Eunice Lipton. Their work appears in journals such as World Literature Today, Theatre Journal and TDR/The Drama Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.