Grover Smith
Impact in
-
- Modernist Literature and Criticism
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Samuel Beckett and Modernism
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- American and British Literature Analysis
- Philosophy top 10%
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Papers in
-
- Modernist Literature and Criticism 8
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 3
- American and British Literature Analysis 1
-
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 2
- Co-authors
- Aldous Huxley (1 shared paper)Ronald Bush (1 shared paper)David Spurr (1 shared paper)John R. Willingham (1 shared paper)Daniel S. Robinson (1 shared paper)Harry Blamires (1 shared paper)Harry T. Costello (1 shared paper)T. S. Eliot (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Literature (4 papers)Philological quarterly (1 paper)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1 paper)Notes and Queries (1 paper)Philosophy East and West (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Grover Smith
11 papers receiving 45 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Literature and Literary Theory 76
- Philosophy 20
- History and Philosophy of Science 8
- History 12
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 5
Countries citing papers authored by Grover Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Grover Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grover Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grover Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Grover Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grover Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grover Smith. The network helps show where Grover Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Grover Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1978 | 39 | |
| 2 | 1958 | 30 | |
| 3 | Letters of Aldous Huxley | 1969 | 15 |
| 4 | 1985 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1957 | 3 | |
| 6 | T. S. Eliot and the Use of Memory | 1996 | 3 |
| 7 | 1964 | 3 | |
| 8 | On Poets and Poetry | 1953 | 2 |
| 9 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1958 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1964 | 1 | |
| 13 | The poems of T.S. Eliot, 1909 - 1928 : a study in symbols and sources | 1978 | 0 |
| 14 | Ford Madox Ford | 1972 | 0 |
| 15 | 1960 | 0 |
About Grover Smith
Grover Smith is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 15 papers that have together received 106 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Modernist Literature and Criticism (8 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper) and Irish and British Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (76 citations), Philosophy (20 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations), History (12 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (5 citations). Grover Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Aldous Huxley, Ronald Bush, David Spurr, John R. Willingham, Daniel S. Robinson, Harry Blamires, Harry T. Costello, T. S. Eliot, M. C. Bradbrook and Dale Riepe. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, Philological quarterly, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Notes and Queries and Philosophy East and West.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.