Greg F. Piepel

831 total citations
38 papers, 496 citations indexed

About

Greg F. Piepel is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Greg F. Piepel has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 496 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 8 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 8 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Greg F. Piepel's work include Optimal Experimental Design Methods (20 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (7 papers) and Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (7 papers). Greg F. Piepel is often cited by papers focused on Optimal Experimental Design Methods (20 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (7 papers) and Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (7 papers). Greg F. Piepel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Greg F. Piepel's co-authors include Scott K. Cooley, John D. Vienna, John J. Borkowski, Jason L. Loeppky, Jeff M. Szychowski, Isabelle Müller, Sandra Furlanetto, Dong‐Sang Kim, Albert A. Kruger and Bradley Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Technometrics and Journal of the American Ceramic Society.

In The Last Decade

Greg F. Piepel

38 papers receiving 473 citations

Peers

Greg F. Piepel
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Management Science and Operations Research 156
  • Materials Chemistry 128
  • Ceramics and Composites 112
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 88
  • Building and Construction 85
Replace Abdo Mohammed Al‐Fakih with:
Abdo Mohammed Al‐Fakih Malaysia
Yutaka Tanaka Japan
Jakob Rehrl Austria
Huiquan Wu United States
Federico Galvanin United Kingdom
Koji Muteki United States
A. R. Manson United States
José F.O. Granjo Portugal
Abdo Mohammed Al‐Fakih Malaysia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Greg F. Piepel
Greg F. Piepel · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Greg F. Piepel
Greg F. Piepel · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Greg F. Piepel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greg F. Piepel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg F. Piepel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg F. Piepel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Greg F. Piepel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg F. Piepel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg F. Piepel. The network helps show where Greg F. Piepel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Greg F. Piepel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Greg F. Piepel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Greg F. Piepel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Greg F. Piepel. Greg F. Piepel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 5
3 4
4 31
5 44
6 22
7 1
8 9
9 38
10 1
11 8
12 9
13 13
14 9
15 36
16 2
17 42
18 14
19 11
20 18

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026