Grant J. Sherborne
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Franziska SchoenebeckIgnacio Funes‐ArdoizChristoph FrickeRufeida MohammedLaurence J. Kershaw CookMalcolm A. HalcrowThomas D. RobertsSantiago Álvarez
- Topics
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (7 papers)Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (5 papers)Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyAngewandte Chemie International EditionCoordination Chemistry Reviews
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyPoland
In The Last Decade
Grant J. Sherborne
11 papers receiving 500 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Organic Chemistry 312
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 175
- Materials Chemistry 148
- Inorganic Chemistry 122
- Oncology 77
Countries citing papers authored by Grant J. Sherborne
This map shows the geographic impact of Grant J. Sherborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grant J. Sherborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grant J. Sherborne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Grant J. Sherborne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grant J. Sherborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grant J. Sherborne. The network helps show where Grant J. Sherborne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Grant J. Sherborne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Grant J. Sherborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Grant J. Sherborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Grant J. Sherborne. Grant J. Sherborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 90 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 94 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 191 |
About Grant J. Sherborne
Grant J. Sherborne is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Radiation, having authored 11 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (7 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (5 papers) and Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (312 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (175 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (122 citations). Grant J. Sherborne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Franziska Schoenebeck, Ignacio Funes‐Ardoiz, Christoph Fricke, Rufeida Mohammed, Laurence J. Kershaw Cook, Malcolm A. Halcrow, Thomas D. Roberts, Santiago Álvarez, Sinem Guven and Amit Dahiya. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Coordination Chemistry Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.