Graham Strong

724 total citations
11 papers, 566 citations indexed

About

Graham Strong is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Graham Strong has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 566 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Epidemiology, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Graham Strong's work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers). Graham Strong is often cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers). Graham Strong collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Graham Strong's co-authors include Jeffrey W. Jutai, Phil Hooper, Elizabeth Russell-Minda, George C. Woo, John G. Flanagan, David B. Elliot, Shirley Rietdyk, Aftab E. Patla, Sandi J. Spaulding and Steve D. M. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Vision, Optometry and Vision Science and The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development.

In The Last Decade

Graham Strong

10 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Graham Strong Canada 8 162 104 85 80 73 11 566
Elizabeth Russell-Minda Canada 8 117 0.7× 54 0.5× 72 0.8× 41 0.5× 76 1.0× 9 632
Phil Hooper Canada 5 80 0.5× 140 1.3× 32 0.4× 116 1.4× 72 1.0× 15 489
Brenda K. Keller United States 8 232 1.4× 33 0.3× 86 1.0× 22 0.3× 190 2.6× 15 534
Hugo Senra Portugal 13 159 1.0× 203 2.0× 30 0.4× 128 1.6× 105 1.4× 42 887
Tsharni Zazryn Australia 12 223 1.4× 87 0.8× 22 0.3× 21 0.3× 80 1.1× 19 882
David K. Ryser United States 19 565 3.5× 23 0.2× 91 1.1× 123 1.5× 60 0.8× 23 970
Claire Howard United Kingdom 18 517 3.2× 288 2.8× 290 3.4× 80 1.0× 32 0.4× 45 965
Otto R Maarsingh Netherlands 17 80 0.5× 187 1.8× 81 1.0× 10 0.1× 94 1.3× 93 1.1k
Lorie A. Forwell Canada 21 609 3.8× 22 0.2× 83 1.0× 218 2.7× 223 3.1× 26 1.2k
Beth Allan New Zealand 4 93 0.6× 122 1.2× 14 0.2× 88 1.1× 89 1.2× 5 737

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Strong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Strong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Strong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Strong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Strong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Strong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Strong. The network helps show where Graham Strong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Strong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Strong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Strong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Strong. Graham Strong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
2.
Guthrie, Dawn M., Paul Stolee, Graham Strong, et al.. (2011). Reliability of standardized assessment for adults who are deafblind. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 48(5). 545–545. 21 indexed citations
3.
Hooper, Phil, Jeffrey W. Jutai, Graham Strong, & Elizabeth Russell-Minda. (2008). Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation: a systematic review. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 43(2). 180–187. 382 indexed citations
4.
Wittich, Walter, et al.. (2007). How to Make Low Vision "Sexy": A Starting Point for Interdisciplinary Student Recruitment. RE view Rehabilitation and Education for Blindness and Visual Impairment. 38(4). 157–163. 1 indexed citations
5.
Strong, Graham. (2004). New video-based assistive technologies for low vision. Journal of Vision. 4(11). 5–5. 3 indexed citations
6.
Strong, Graham, et al.. (2003). The psychosocial impact of closed-circuit television low vision aids. 5(3). 179–190. 16 indexed citations
7.
Jutai, Jeffrey W., et al.. (2003). The predictability of retention and discontinuation of contact lenses.. PubMed. 74(5). 299–308. 17 indexed citations
8.
Elliott, David B., et al.. (1998). A Comparison of Low Vision Clinic Data with Low Vision Survey and Blindness Registration Information. Optometry and Vision Science. 75(4). 272–278. 8 indexed citations
9.
Elliot, David B., Aftab E. Patla, John G. Flanagan, et al.. (1995). The Waterloo Vision and Mobility Study: postural control strategies in subjects with ARM. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 15(6). 553–559. 56 indexed citations
10.
Strong, Graham. (1992). AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE. Optometry and Vision Science. 69(11). 911–911. 20 indexed citations
11.
Strong, Graham & George C. Woo. (1985). A Distance Visual Acuity Chart Incorporating Some New Design Features. Archives of Ophthalmology. 103(1). 44–46. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026