Graeme Tosh
Impact in
- Periodontics top 5%
- Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 9
-
- Mental Health Treatment and Access 8
- Co-authors
- Andrew Clifton (15 shared papers)Clive E Adams (5 shared papers)Karla Soares‐Weiser (2 shared papers)Jun Xia (2 shared papers)Mariam A Khokhar (2 shared papers)Hannah Jones (1 shared paper)Hayley E Jones (1 shared paper)Priya Khanna (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (7 papers)Schizophrenia Bulletin (2 papers)International Journal of Nursing Studies (1 paper)Trials (1 paper)Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Graeme Tosh
17 papers receiving 314 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Periodontics 74
- Psychiatry and Mental health 102
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 35
- General Health Professions 96
- Social Psychology 69
Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Tosh
This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Tosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Tosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Tosh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Tosh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Tosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Tosh. The network helps show where Graeme Tosh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Graeme Tosh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pragmatic vs explanatory trials: the pragmascope tool to help measure differences in protocols of mental health randomized controlled trials. | 2011 | 51 |
| 2 | 2011 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 1 |
About Graeme Tosh
Graeme Tosh is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Periodontics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (8 papers), Dental Health and Care Utilization (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Periodontics (74 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (102 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (35 citations), General Health Professions (96 citations) and Social Psychology (69 citations). Graeme Tosh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Clifton, Clive E Adams, Karla Soares‐Weiser, Jun Xia, Mariam A Khokhar, Hannah Jones, Hayley E Jones, Priya Khanna, David Banks and Nicola Wright. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Schizophrenia Bulletin, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Trials and Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.