Graeme Moir
Impact in
- Dermatology top 10%
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research 3
- Cancer and Skin Lesions 2
- Oncology 5
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management 2
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 1
- Co-authors
- R. Cerio (4 shared papers)Harshad Navsaria (2 shared papers)John L. Hungerford (1 shared paper)Victoria M.L. Cohen (1 shared paper)Catherine Harwood (2 shared papers)P.A. Dewan (1 shared paper)Salvador J. Díaz‐Cano (1 shared paper)Amer Durrani (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Dermatology (2 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Annals of Plastic Surgery (1 paper)Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (1 paper)Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalySlovenia
In The Last Decade
Graeme Moir
14 papers receiving 155 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Dermatology 42
- Ophthalmology 36
- Rehabilitation 19
- Oncology 72
- Biotechnology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Moir
This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Moir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Moir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Moir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Moir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Moir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Moir. The network helps show where Graeme Moir may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graeme Moir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 4 | ERICA predicts response to tamoxifen in elderly women with breast cancer. | 1991 | 14 |
| 5 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 12 | Nurse-led management of hypertrophic and keloid scars. | 2004 | 4 |
| 13 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 0 |
About Graeme Moir
Graeme Moir is a scholar working on Dermatology, Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Biotechnology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 162 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dermatologic Treatments and Research (3 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (2 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (2 papers), Abdominal Surgery and Complications (1 paper), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (1 paper) and Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (42 citations), Ophthalmology (36 citations), Rehabilitation (19 citations), Oncology (72 citations) and Biotechnology (20 citations). Graeme Moir has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include R. Cerio, Harshad Navsaria, John L. Hungerford, Victoria M.L. Cohen, Catherine Harwood, P.A. Dewan, Salvador J. Díaz‐Cano, Amer Durrani, J.H. Stevenson and Kelvin Lau. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Annals of Plastic Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.