Grace Smith

2.3k total citations
8 papers, 79 citations indexed

About

Grace Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Cancer Research and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Grace Smith has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 79 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Ecology, 2 papers in Cancer Research and 1 paper in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Grace Smith's work include RNA modifications and cancer (1 paper), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (1 paper) and Nematode management and characterization studies (1 paper). Grace Smith is often cited by papers focused on RNA modifications and cancer (1 paper), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (1 paper) and Nematode management and characterization studies (1 paper). Grace Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Grace Smith's co-authors include Ashley M. Smith, Benjamin L. King, Viravuth P. Yin, Michael C. Rosenstein, Eric R. Gallandt, Jianjun Hao, Faridi Qaium, Jagan Muppidi, George W. Wright and Paola Nappa and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Experimental Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Geoderma.

In The Last Decade

Grace Smith

6 papers receiving 77 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Grace Smith United States	5	21	21	20	15	11	8	79
J. González-Cuevas Mexico	6	30 1.4×	12 0.6×	14 0.7×	4 0.3×	5 0.5×	6	98
Debbie Hughes United Kingdom	6	32 1.5×	16 0.8×	14 0.7×	14 0.9×	7 0.6×	14	116
Jiří Špaček Czechia	6	17 0.8×	7 0.3×	11 0.6×	24 1.6×	3 0.3×	23	95
André M. Ribeiro-dos-Santos Brazil	8	87 4.1×	27 1.3×	8 0.4×	18 1.2×	5 0.5×	18	154
Marie Navratilova Czechia	4	55 2.6×	13 0.6×	21 1.1×	10 0.7×	9 0.8×	4	140
Luc Roberts Canada	4	58 2.8×	11 0.5×	13 0.7×	39 2.6×	2 0.2×	5	118
Nathan Pate United States	5	20 1.0×	5 0.2×	12 0.6×	22 1.5×	5 0.5×	13	70
Rachel Coleby United Kingdom	6	21 1.0×	9 0.4×	16 0.8×	45 3.0×	5 0.5×	9	120
Keisuke Orimo Japan	7	32 1.5×	8 0.4×	15 0.8×	52 3.5×	17 1.5×	11	123
Haocheng Wang China	7	40 1.9×	8 0.4×	20 1.0×	24 1.6×		23	133

Countries citing papers authored by Grace Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace Smith. The network helps show where Grace Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Grace Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Grace Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Grace Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Grace Smith. Grace Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Pastore, Melissa A., Sarah J. Nelson, Elizabeth A. Burakowski, et al.. (2025). Snow refugia: Managing temperate forest canopies to maintain winter conditions. Ecosphere. 16(7). 1 indexed citations

2.

Perdrial, Nicolas, et al.. (2024). Influence of parent material mineralogy on forest soil nutrient release rates across a nutrient richness gradient. Geoderma. 451. 117081–117081.

3.

Corrigan, Kelsey L., Bryce B. Reeve, Larissa A. Meyer, et al.. (2024). The Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Predict Symptom Burden and Health-Related Quality of Life After Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Study. Practical Radiation Oncology. 14(5). e353–e361.

4.

Discepolo, Valentina, Luca Pierri, Massimo Mascolo, et al.. (2021). Bilateral Chilblain-like Lesions of the Toes Characterized by Microvascular Remodeling in Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Network Open. 4(6). e2111369–e2111369. 13 indexed citations

5.

Kotlov, Nikita, Olga Plotnikova, Krystle Nomie, et al.. (2020). Compromised counterselection by FAS creates an aggressive subtype of germinal center lymphoma. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 218(3). 20 indexed citations

6.

Dang, Ha X., Pradeep S. Chauhan, Haley Ellis, et al.. (2020). Cell-Free DNA Alterations in the AR Enhancer and Locus Predict Resistance to AR-Directed Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer. JCO Precision Oncology. 4(4). 680–713. 21 indexed citations

7.

Smith, Grace, et al.. (2019). Effects of Field and Greenhouse Solarization on Soil Microbiota and Weed Seeds in the Northeast USA. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 66–78. 9 indexed citations

8.

King, Benjamin L., et al.. (2018). RegenDbase: a comparative database of noncoding RNA regulation of tissue regeneration circuits across multiple taxa. npj Regenerative Medicine. 3(1). 10–10. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact