Grace Lees‐Maffei

447 citations
32 papers · 156 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Grace Lees‐Maffei

27 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers

Grace Lees‐Maffei
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Museology 46
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 47
  • Conservation 24
  • Urban Studies 29
  • Architecture 5
Replace Cheryl Buckley with:
Cheryl Buckley United Kingdom
Stephen E. Weil United States
Ruth P. Rubinstein United States
Julia Bryan-Wilson United States
Gregory Sholette United States
Aaron Betsky United States
Andrew McClellan United States
Philipp Schorch Germany
Mary Bittner Wiseman United States
Siegfried Giedion
Grace Lees‐Maffei relative to Cheryl Buckley United Kingdom Cheryl Buckley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cheryl Buckley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grace Lees‐Maffei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace Lees‐Maffei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace Lees‐Maffei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace Lees‐Maffei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace Lees‐Maffei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace Lees‐Maffei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace Lees‐Maffei. The network helps show where Grace Lees‐Maffei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Grace Lees‐Maffei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grace Lees‐Maffei Line = papers co-authored together Grace Lees‐Maffei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200929
2 200820
3 200416
4 200711
5 200110
6 20039
7 20018
8 20127
9 20167
10
The Design History Reader
20106
11 20026
12 20144
13 20023
14
Introduction: Studying Advice: Historiography, Methodology, Commentary, Bibliography
20163
15
From service to self-service: etiquette writing as design discourse 1920-1970
20012
16 20092
17
Writing Design: Words and Objects
20122
18 20191
19 20211
20
Balancing the object: the reinvention of Alessi
19971

About Grace Lees‐Maffei

Grace Lees‐Maffei is a scholar working on Museology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Conservation, Urban Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crafts, Textile, and Design (10 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (9 papers), Architecture, Design, and Social History (7 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (5 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (5 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers), Digital Media and Visual Art (2 papers) and Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (46 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (47 citations), Conservation (24 citations), Urban Studies (29 citations) and Architecture (5 citations). Grace Lees‐Maffei has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Kjetil Fallan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Design History, Design and Culture, Women s History Review, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education and Modern Italy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact